View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

PCC: Sunday Mail did not breach code with secret prison photographs

By William Turvill

The Press Complaints Commission has judged that the Sunday Mail did not breach the Editors’ Code of Practice with a story exposing conditions in a prison in Peterhead, Scotland.

The paper published pictures from within the prison suggesting that conditions in HMP Peterhead for convicted sex offenders were undermining efforts to rehabilitate inmates.

The pictures, showing prisoners had access to violent and sexually explicit DVDs, were believed to have been taken using a hidden camera.

The report was complained about by the wife of a Peterhead prison officer who had taken his own life shortly after publication. The complainant believes her husband had unwittingly allowed the camera to enter the prison.

She also claimed the newspaper had paid a convicted criminal for the photographs.

She claimed the report breached Clause 10 (Clandestine devices and subterfuge) and Clause 16 (Payment to criminals) of the Editors' Code.

The Sunday Mail defended the article, claiming there was an overwhelming public interest in publishing the story and said it did not breach the code – though it did acknowledge the photographs had been taken without inmates’ knowledge.

Content from our partners
How Germany's Ippen.Media mastered content planning across 86 newsrooms
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries

It admitted to making a payment to an anonymous source outside the prison but claimed it had not agreed to pay a convicted criminal, had not commissioned the pictures and did not provide the camera.

The paper said it had exposed prison service failings rather than exploited or glamourised crime.

The PCC “expressed sympathy” with the complainant but ruled in favour of the Sunday Mail, saying that the coverage had not breached Clause 16 and had publicised “genuine and serious” concerns about conditions in the prison.

The commission also ruled that the report was in the public interest and did not breach Clause 10.

Charlotte Dewar, director of complaints and pre-publication services, said: "This was a tragic case, and the commission expressed its sympathy to the complainant for her loss.

“Nonetheless, there was a strong public interest in the publication of this material, and the newspaper was able to demonstrate that it had acted in compliance with the Code."

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network