Dismiss

Turkish media plurality 'in agony' under President Erdogan says Reporters Without Borders rep ahead of country's snap elections

A Turkish press freedom campaigner, who was once jailed for expressing solidarity with a pro-Kurdish newspaper, has said only 20 per cent of the country’s free critical press remains following a brutal media crackdown.

Erol Onderoglu, who has worked with Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontieres) for 20 years, spoke to Press Gazette ahead of Turkey’s snap presidential and parliamentary elections this coming Sunday.

Turkey is currently locked in a state of emergency following a failed coup against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in July 2016.

Under this two-year regime, Erdogan has closed more than 150 news outlets and jailed dozens of journalists, earning Turkey its reputation as the world’s biggest jailer of journalists.

It currently ranks 157th out of 180 countries worldwide for press freedom, according to RSF’s World Press Freedom Index.

The media crackdown was seen as coming to a head in February this year when six journalists, including prominent reporters Ahmet Altan, Mehmet Altan and Nazli Ilicak, were each sentenced to life in prison.

They were accused of having links to US-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen whom Turkey blames for the failed coup attempt, although Gulen denies the accusation.

Onderoglu himself spent ten days in jail in June 2016, a month before the coup attempt, on pre-trial detention after supporting daily Özgur Gündem, which he said was being submitted to a “tough judicial crackdown”.

His case, which is ongoing, drew international attention, including a personal statement from UN general secretary Ban Ki-Moon. His next hearing is expected in October.

Said Onderoglu: “It was a purely symbolic position from my side, but for the Turkish judiciary it was a pretext to accuse me for spreading propaganda in favour of outlawed [Kurdish workers’] organisation PKK.”

Onderoglu said in recent months at least eight journalists were convicted for insulting the president under Article 299 – “just for taking a position against his policies” – and that journalists were appearing daily at Istanbul High Criminal Court on these charges.

He said 42 journalists, columnists, cartoonists and reporters had been convicted based on this article of criminal code since Erdogan came to power in August 2014 in the Turkey’s first direct presidential election.

Said Onderoglu: “I think even before the coup Turkey was already far from European Union reform spirit. At RSF we have denounced many times the lack of judiciary independence, the lack of respect of rule of law.

“Over the last decade Erdogan has taken control of the mainstream media on the ground. Today we are just trying to advocate for the remaining 20 per cent of national mainstream media who present different views – pro-Kurdish, leftist and secular.”

In a report on Turkey ahead of the country’s elections this weekend, European body the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights said: “The media landscape is dominated by outlets whose owners are considered affiliated with the Government or depend on public contracts.”

Onderoglu, who began his career as a journalist in 1997 working for news website Bianet which he then edited for several years, told Press Gazette there was “only about 20 per cent of the free press left in Turkey”.

“The Government has targeted control of mainstream media organs,” he said. “For some media groups it was just a question of financial interest with the Government… they want to maintain good relations with them.

“Or ideologically a media group is close to the Government circle… but all these journalists working for critical media groups or outlets are facing prosecution on a daily basis.”

Last year President Erdogan was gifted sweeping new presidential powers after the Turkish people approved the move in a national referendum.

But Onderoglu said “where people should normally have the right to access various political views they were deprived of these communication channels” during the referendum as a result of the media crackdown.

He said controversial political issues were all “new forms of taboo which editorial houses don’t want to approach anymore” as a result of a campaign of intimidation by the Turkish Government.

“I think media plurality in Turkey is in agony,” said Onderoglu.

“I believe that Turkish media organs should be free enough to be independent. Unfortunately in Turkey we don’t have any more independent media because the media landscape, like the society, is very polarised.”

He said even pro-Government newspapers had a “very limited circulation” of about 100,000 copies a day. “Under normal circumstances it’s not enough to have a sustainable financial situation,” he said.

“They are enjoying very strong advertisement revenues because they are close to the Government and close to public institutions, but for critical media in the same situation this is not the case.

“They are much more exposed to financial crisis because financial networks are threatened when they want to provide advertisement to critical media. These groups refrain from supporting a free press financially.”

Turkey has a population of about 80m. There are 30 national daily newspapers, but the total circulation of these is no more than 3m – about a million fewer than before a state of emergency was declared.

Among the news outlets that are critical of Erdogan’s regime this falls to 300,000 copies a day with dozens of critical news outlets having “disappeared”, Onderoglu said.

During his time in jail, Onderoglu said the “physical circumstances” of the two prisons where he was held were “very bad”, but that he was treated better than most thanks to international coverage of his plight and his role at RSF.

He said journalists jailed under Erdogan’s media crackdown were locked up without family visits “for months on end”.

He said: “They faced a letter ban and very limited weekly visits, for one hour, with their lawyers observed by guards and cameras. These bans and restrictions get lifted only after more than a year of isolation.”

Despite the high profile of some of those detained, he said they could not find a lawyer to defend them in pre-detention. Some of them are still behind bars after two years while others have been sentenced to life in prison without pardons.

Said Onderoglu: “It is a very crucial moment to monitor all these cases in Turkey and to measure how the judiciary itself is manipulated and targeted by these controversial measures under the state of emergency.

“The most desperate thing [in jail] is you expect something from the judiciary, but you don’t have remedies. You want at least to explain yourself before the court after many months, many years of pre-trial detention, but these people couldn’t get this opportunity.

“These are very political trials. My concern is that if Turkey is radically pushed towards isolation, many dozens more journalists will spend a big part of their life in Turkish prison.

“I think it is very important to put an end to these abusers and encourage Turkey to take the path of democratic reforms again.”

When Erdogan visited the UK for three days last month to meet with Prime Minister Theresa May, Erdogan said at a press conference that all the journalists locked in Turkish jails were “terrorist criminals”.

Onderoglu said May’s failure to be more vocal in criticising Erdogan’s policy of jailing journalists was an “opportunity missed”. He said: “In my view, there comes a point where you cannot be a sustainable and really trustworthy partner if you neglect human rights standards for a long time, as in Turkey.”

He added: “I’m sure that Britain is well-informed enough to know some concrete names of prominent journalists who have spent at least two years behind bars as pre-trial detention.

“We are much more excited when Governments are publicly expressing that they are well-informed and aware of specific issues. That is the support that we really can notice… I believe that the UK should not be a country that shakes the hand whatever the human rights record of a country.”

He said the British Government should have a “frank and firm dialogue” with Turkey, pursuing dialogue and “underlining the importance of safeguarding human rights standards while all the time reminding it that respect of fundamental rights goes together with a sustainable society facilitating also trade and mutual exchange.

“The free press is a very big part of that because western public opinion is aware that without a free press in Turkey this might also impact the welfare of the Turkish people and their capacity to be open to the external world.”

Onderoglu said it was not certain that Erdogan would definitely win the upcoming election or whether, upon winning, he would pursue a path of national conciliation.

He said: “I think, like in the past, Erdogan might feel himself under threat even when a very small newspaper covers quite critical issues. Let’s take the example of Cumhuriyet (Turkey’s oldest daily newspaper) covering weapon transfers towards jihadist group in Syria.

“Any single newspaper covering politics in an independent way might disturb Erdogan in the future.

“It will really depend what is his intention, but as I said independent critical media in Turkey is under agony so Erdogan really needs very little to push him to shut down those few independent voices that remain.”

This piece was produced in association with RSF who supported the British Journalism Awards.

Picture: RSF

Comments
No comments to display

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *