View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
March 27, 2015

IPSO’s ‘informal’ investigation of Sunday Mirror Brooks Newmark sting shows regulator’s ‘impotence’ says Hacked Off

By Dominic Ponsford

The Independent Press Standard’s Organisation’s investigation into The Sunday Mirror’s Brooks Newmark sting has been condemned for exposing the regulator’s weaknesses.

IPSO cleared the Sunday Mirror and Guido Fawkes reporter Alex Wickham of breaching the Editors’ Code over a sting in which former minister Brooks Newmark sent a lewd picture of himself to a reporter posing on Twitter as a “twenty something Tory PR girl”.

Because there was no complaint it appears that under IPSO rules it was not allowed to make a formal adjudication. And the Sunday Mirror’s involvement in the IPSO inquiry is understood to have been on a voluntary basis.

In January, IPSO chairman Sir Alan Moses told MPs he had urged press owners to “put a large amount of red pencil” through rules which allow publishers to “obfuscate and resist” investigations.

IPSO is currently in discussion with lawyers from publishing companies about changing rules which have been described by Moses as "opaque, sometimes self-contradictory, difficult to understand and sometimes difficult to find".

Evan Harris of the campaign group Hacked Off said that IPSO's investigation of the Brooks Newmark sting demonstrates its “impotence”.

He said: “IPSO's rules prevented it from adjudicating on the matter because Mark Pritchard MP withdrew his complaint after the Mirror made a donation and Newmark chose not to complain. The so-called ‘independent’ regulator could only start its subsequent quasi-investigation once it had negotiated limited permission from the Mirror.

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

“IPSO also had no power to get the information it needed from the Sunday Mirror to properly investigate the alleged use of subterfuge. Under IPSO’s own rules, the Mirror only had to provide information voluntarily – there was no requirement to hand over material that might incriminate themselves.

“Again, under its rules, IPSO was prevented from speaking to the freelance journalist who instigated the sting. The Mirror’s excuse for not handing over the information – ‘confidentiality’ – was spurious because IPSO had their own rules which would have respected the confidentiality. IPSO could not persuade the Mirror, and the Mirror was not required to comply.

“IPSO had no power to formally investigate; no power to adjudicate because their own rules don’t let them (unless Brooks Newmark himself complains); and no power to act if they had found against the Sunday Mirror. This was not an adjudication – the Sunday Mirror has reminded them that under their own rules they have no power to adjudicate.

“What we have is a no-man’s land of an informal investigation without any teeth or relevance. It also chose not to investigate the use of pictures of members of the public without their permission, despite their own public expressions of concern. 

“IPSO has been left looking for a role and for relevance. Their attempt to show that they have a purpose and power has merely highlighted that in reality they don’t.”  

Topics in this article : , ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network