
The serious harm test for defamation should be a “one-off exercise” and should not be revisited following a change in circumstances, a lawyer for Arron Banks has argued in his libel appeal against journalist Carole Cadwalladr.
[UPDATE: Arron Banks wins Carole Cadwalladr libel appeal and set to receive damages]
The barrister also objected to a High Court judge’s decision that a tweet about the Brexit donor did not cause him serious harm because it was published to Cadwalladr’s followers whose opinion “was of no consequence to him”.
You've reached your limit of free articles
Please register now to continue reading