View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
April 13, 2006updated 22 Nov 2022 6:53pm

The Lawyer runs Da Vinci Code verdict leak

By Press Gazette

By Roger Pearson

The author of The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown, may have emerged winner in the epic High Court battle in which he was accused of plagiarism in respect of his multi-million best-seller.

But as far as the media was concerned, the hands-down winner was The Lawyer magazine, which had the verdict on the case up on its website a full hour before the judge delivered it in the High Court.

The world’s media had covered the case and assembled in near unprecedented numbers for Mr Justice Peter Smith to give his judgment on Friday afternoon.

However, it then emerged that the judge’s decision had been "leaked" and had been on The Lawyer’s website long before he announced it in public.

The judge prefaced his judgment by saying that he had drawn to the attention of lawyers the need for the result to be kept under wraps until he delivered it in court.

However, he continued: "Despite what I said when I reserved judgment it has transpired The Lawyer has for over an hour had the result of this judgment on its website."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

He indicated that the matter would be raised again at a later stage.

The Lawyer leads pack as it breaks Da Vinci Code verdict The story, claimed as "a worldwide exclusive", was later dropped from The Lawyer’s website on Friday.

The Lawyer refused to comment.

From the point of view of a media operation, however, the judge and the court administrators this time deserve praise.

The judge read out a concise summary of his decision in court and copies of the judgment and summary were then made available.

However, before the copies on paper were available, the court administrators had the judgment on the Court Services website in record time.

A court insider said: "There was criticism of the way seating arrangements were handled during the court hearing, but few in the media could criticise the way the judgment was handled, apart from the fact it was leaked an hour beforehand. But that was no fault of the judge or the court administration."

Photo: Reuters.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network