View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
June 24, 2011

Telegraph’s Lynn Barber libel casel will not be heard by jury

By Press Gazette

A High Court judge was wrong to decide that the trial of the Daily Telegraph’s long-running libel battle with academic and writer Dr Sarah Thornton should be held with a jury, the Court of Appeal has decided.

The court remitted the case back to Mr Justice Tugendhat following the newspaper’s successful appeal against the jury trial decision yesterday.

Thornton is suing the newspaper over what she claims is a defamatory reference to copy approval in journalist Lynn Barber’s review of her book, Seven Days in the Art World, which appeared in the paper’s Saturday edition on November 1, 2008. She also claims malicious falsehood.

The newspaper pleads honest comment.

There was no application for a jury trial, but Mr Justice Tugendhat ordered trial by jury as part of consensual directions.

But after the decision in Cook v Telegraph Media Group, in which the court declined to exercise its discretion to allow a jury trial when all the relevant factors favoured trial by judge alone, the newspaper made an unsuccessful application for judge-only trial – arguing that no application for a jury trial had been made under Civil Procedure Rules.

The approach taken by the court when it made the direction by consent for a jury trial was understandable, but since then there had been a change in circumstances, namely the decision in Cook, the court decided.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

The court also found it was possible the judge had been too focused on the newspaper’s jurisdiction argument and he should have considered the matter more broadly.

It was inconceivable – and it had not been suggested – that the parties had taken steps towards a jury trial, and therefore finality was not an issue.

There was no suggestion by Dr Thornton that there was a special reason why a judge-only trial would be inappropriate or why the instant late appeal would prejudice her. The matter would be remitted to the judge.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network