View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. National Newspapers
August 23, 2019updated 30 Sep 2022 8:15am

Reporter says Bureau of Investigative Journalism asked her to sign NDA

By Freddy Mayhew

A former Bureau of Investigative Journalism reporter has said the non-profit news outfit tried to subject her to a non-disclosure agreement during an employment dispute.

Melanie Newman brought a claim for constructive dismissal after she resigned from the Bureau in May last year, having worked there for eight years and been made home editor.

Newman’s bio on the Bureau’s website says she was involved in many of its “high-profile stories”, including its work on lobbying and political funding.

In a written submission to a parliamentary inquiry into NDAs, Newman said she was advised that a draft settlement put forward by the Bureau in December as part of her exit agreement “could have prohibited me following up a story I had reported on at the Bureau”.

The agreement, seen by Press Gazette, included a clause requiring her not to disclose confidential information “relating to the work she undertook in reporting on GOSH (Great Ormond Street Hospital)”.

It would also have prevented her from making “any disparaging or derogatory comments” about Bureau staff or bringing them into disrepute.

Newman told MPs she was given a matter of hours to agree to the terms of the deal or it would be withdrawn, but refused to sign.

Content from our partners
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution

She said: “A factor that led to my constructive dismissal was my treatment by the Bureau’s management after my queries twice uncovered errors in stories produced by colleagues.

“One of these stories had to be amended post-publication.

“The… clause in the NDA would have forbidden me from drawing attention to any errors or inaccuracies in the Bureau’s future published stories.”

The Bureau said its lawyers had made clear to Newman that it only sought to prevent her from disclosing “internal confidential material” and not journalistic material or stop her from following up stories.

In a statement a Bureau spokesperson said: “This was an employment dispute between Melanie Newman and the Bureau – at no point were there claims of discrimination or whistleblowing.

“The dispute was settled between legal representatives on standard terms which both parties agreed were acceptable.

“Neither the Bureau nor its lawyers recognise the depiction of events now outlined by Melanie. We did not at any point seek to prevent her following up stories or raising any public interest matters.”

Both sides reached a settlement agreement through arbitration service ACAS in April this year.

Newman told MPs it was agreed “on confidentiality terms little different from those in my staff contract”. It included a specific clause that makes clear the agreement does not prevent her from reporting on GOSH.

In her submission, Newman said she believed her “knowledge of the law and experience gained through reporting on employment cases” was what enabled her to push back on the NDA.

“I believe most other claimants in this position would have been unable to resist,” she said.

She also said “gagging clauses” were “inappropriate in employment cases whenever they are imposed, rather than truly voluntary”.

Newman declined to comment for this article.

Picture: Pixabay

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network