View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Mirror and Bristol Post settle IPSO complaint with apology letters to family who claimed reports’ graphic details ‘not heard in court’

By Freddy Mayhew

Mirror Online and Bristol Post sent private letters of apology to a grieving family after they complained of graphic detail about their relative’s death in reports of a court hearing ahead of a murder trial.

Hate crime victim support agency Stand Against Racism and Inequality complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) on behalf of Kamaran Ahmad Ali and his family over articles that were published by both news outlets on 8 September this year.

The reports covered a hearing at Bristol Magistrates’ Court setting the date for a murder trial into the death of Kamil Ahmad and included detail that his family claimed had not been mentioned in court – namely that Ahmad had been found with his penis “cut off”.

The Post story was headlined: “Murder trial set after man had his penis cut off”. Mirror.co.uk said: “Man charged with murder after neighbour found dead ‘with his penis chopped off’.”

The complainant said the family had “not been aware of these details prior to publication of the article” and that their inclusion had intruded into the family’s private life and grief.

They also claimed publication had “not been handled sensitively” and that the articles had caused the family distress.

The complaint fell under Clause 2, covering privacy, and Clause 4, covering intrusion into grief or shock, under the Editor’s Code of Practice.

Content from our partners
Mather Economics and InsurAds combine to help publishers boost revenue
Press Gazette publishes ultimate guide to reader conversion and monetisation
Slow online ads cost UK publishers £50m a year: Here's how to fix them

Neither publication accepted that there had been a breach of the code, saying the details had been referred to at a Magistrate’s court hearing, and that this information had been passed on “by a reliable contact at the court”.

They said that they “had a right and duty to report on these details, as they were heard in open court and because it concerned matters of public interest”.

During IPSO’s investigation into the matter, both publications offered to write a private letter of apology to the family. The complainant said this would resolve the matter to the family’s satisfaction.

As the complaint had been mediated, IPSO did not decide on whether there had been a breach of the code.

Topics in this article : , ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network