View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Sir Harold Evans backs Guardian’s right to scrutinise power despite being underwhelmed by ‘narcissistic’ Edward Snowden

By Darren Boyle

Former Times and Sunday Times editor Sir Harold Evans has dismissed attacks on The Guardian from other newspapers over its spying revelation as part of the "dog eat dog fun of Fleet Street".

Writing in the Observer, Evans said it was vital that newspapers maintained a close eye on the Government and agencies of the state.

“No editor in his right mind wants to give aid and comfort to murderous enemies, but every editor is duty-bound to scrutinise the use of power – responsibly but fearlessly – however personally unappealing a leaker may be. Conflict between the conceptions of duty is inevitable, indeed healthy.

“Reporting often exposes an ill that government has not recognised or been willing to acknowledge. The state is not ominiscient. Nor is it unknown for government to conceal its own mistakes. I have not been impressed by the blather about ‘freedom of the press’ surrounding the narcissistic Edward Snowden, but one point he made on 17 October bears examination: he had to do what he did, he argues, because the National Security Agency hierarchy required him to ‘report wrongdoing for those most responsible for it’. True or false?.”

Evans said the Washington Times was reckless when they printed that the US was able to monitor Osama Bin Laden’s mobile phone.

He said while editing the Sunday Times they ran several stories on national security issues that brought criticism on the newspaper.

“We took national security as seriously as anyone, but over 14 years the barriers erected against legitimate inquiry on grounds of national security – reporting, not document dumps – proved spurious or self-serving. Kim Philby betrayed his country and sent countless people to their deaths.

Content from our partners
Five ways to fail in media job interviews
How Germany's Ippen.Media mastered content planning across 86 newsrooms
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today

“However, when we exposed the full measure of his treacheries the outrage in government and sections of the press was directed not at Philby and those who protected him for years but at our reporters. The diaries of the scholarly cabinet minister Richard Crossman have been recognised as shedding valuable light on the way we are governed, but government made a full-scale attempt to censor their publication. Same yet again in the long ordeal of Northern Ireland. Cheerleading was exalted and real reporting excoriated.”

Meanwhile former Liberal Democrat cabinet minister Chris Huhne has said the Labour Party may have signed off on the controversial Tempora GCHQ spying system before the last general election.

Writing in the Observer, Huhne admitted the Cabinet was never briefed about the extent of GCHQ’s spying.

Huhne resigned from Cabinet after trying to cover up a speeding offence and was jailed along with his former wife after she accepted his penalty points.

He dismissed the investigation by the House of Commons Intelligence and Security Committee as a virtual whitewash, claiming the committee will give GCHQ “a clean bill of health”.

He said: “GCHQ has the capacity to scoop up and store the email and voice traffic of the entire population of this country, regardless of whether they are suspects or have ever committed any crime. GCHQ says it only looks at the suspect messages, but what are its checks? Given its inability to keep its own secrets, how credibly can it promise to keep ours?

“The invasion of privacy is breath-taking. The defence that you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide is as outrageous as it was when made by the totalitarian states. Citizens may – for good or bad reasons – want their activity to be private without in any way being illegal. Privacy matters.”

Huhne argued a judicial review is necessary to investigate the legality of the Tempora scheme.

“The Snowden revelations show an executive arm snatching exaggerated powers with no public debate or parliamentary approval. For the sake of our freedoms, but also our democracy, this needs to be put right.”

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network