View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Guardian to be pursued for legal costs if Government wins Supreme Court bid to block Prince Charles letters

By PA Mediapoint and Press Gazette

The Government will pursue the Guardian newspaper for legal costs if it successfully blocks the publication of the Prince of Wales's letters to ministers.
Solicitor General Oliver Heald said if the Government successfully blocks the release of Charles's letters in the Supreme Court it will expect the newspaper to pay its legal fees "to protect public funds".
Guardian journalist Rob Evans has been trying to make the letters public under the Freedom of Information Act and in September 2012 a High Court ruled in his favour.
Government departments did not intervene but Attorney General Dominic Grieve overruled the decision a month later.
But earlier this month the Court of Appeal ruled that Mr Grieve had "no good reason" for overriding the High Court's decision and said his veto was incompatible with EU law.
Grieve claimed that releasing the letters would undermine the principle of the heir to the throne being politically neutral and was granted permission to appeal against the latest ruling to the Supreme Court.
Today at Attorney General questions Heald said if the Government is successful in the Supreme Court, it will seek to have all legal costs paid for by the Guardian.
He was asked by Labour's Paul Flynn (Newport West) in the Commons: "How much is the department spending to contest Freedom of Information decisions, court decisions, in order to suppress information to the public?
"The claim has been made that information is available that would show that an important person is unfit to do his future job.
"Shouldn't we allow the letters, the lobbying letters of Prince Charles to be made public?"
Heald replied: "You are raising a case which involves issues of constitutional significance, which includes upholding Parliament's intentions for the Freedom of Information regime and the Government's ability to protect information in the public interest.
"It is important the Government continues to fight the case in question.
"To protect public funds however if we are successful in the next stage of the legal proceedings we will expect the Guardian to meet our legal costs in full."

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network