View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
March 7, 2002updated 22 Nov 2022 12:47pm

Press freedom and medical confidentiality

By Press Gazette

The Court of Appeal has just decided an important case balancing the competing public interests of press freedom versus medical confidentiality.  A healthcare worker ("H") was diagnosed HIV positive. He resigned from his practice and notified the relevant local authority.

The authority requested details of the patients whom H had treated to evaluate whether they were at risk and should be notified.

H did not believe that his former patients were at sufficient risk to justify this procedure. H, therefore, commenced proceedings seeking a declaration that he need not disclose the confidential patient details and that his own identity should remain confidential.

A master ordered that the parties’ identities should not be disclosed pending the full trial.

The Mail on Sunday heard about H’s action and wrote an article: "Judge’s gag over Aids threat to patients." H then obtained a gagging order against the newspaper restraining it from soliciting or publishing any information which could identify H or his patients.  The newspaper succeeded in varying the order on public interest grounds. The newspaper was allowed to identify the authority and publish information that many months had elapsed since H was diagnosed and that the authority’s evaluation was unlikely to take place for a long time, if at all.

He appealed. The Court of Appeal ruled, in order to avoid pre-empting determination of the issues in H’s first action and widespread public alarm, that H and the authority should not be identified. However, acknowledging the importance of restraining free speech only where absolutely necessary, the embargo on not disclosing that H was a dentist and the prohibition on the newspaper from soliciting information were lifted.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The court also held that H should make patient records available, as the authority reasonably required for its evaluation, but only on the basis that they were not disclosed or acted upon without H or the court’s permission.

 

Jennifer McDermott is a partner at

Lovells’ Computers, Communications and Media Unit

Jennifer McDermott

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network