View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
August 23, 2001updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Police chiefs urged to help press on victims

By Press Gazette

Neville

A new initiative aimed at easing the strained relations between the police and press over the release of information on crime and accident victims has been launched by the Association of Chief Police Officers.

In a letter to all chief constables, ACPO’s media advisory group chairman, Elizabeth Neville, urges her colleagues to "do what they can" to seek consent from victims to release personal details to the press.

The letter from Neville, the chief constable of Wiltshire, follows complaints, particularly from local newspaper editors, that routine information about crashes and crimes has dried up since ACPO introduced new guidelines on naming victims in December last year.

Neville tells her colleagues that the guidelines explain the legal position Ð that the police have no rights to give out personal details of anyone involved in crimes or accidents without their consent – and comply with the Data Protection and Human Rights Acts.

But she admits: "The problem with this guidance has been its implementation. The position most police forces have long adopted, not to release details of victims of crime, is not really tenable. The decision is not one for the police to take, but the victim."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

However, she says, getting police to ask victims whether they want their details released has proved difficult.

"If it is possible to introduce systems persuading police staff to ask the question, the flow of information should increase, as many victims of crime and people involved in other incidents are happy to see their names in the media," she says.

Neville urges police chiefs to get their officers "to do what they can to foster good media relations and to make information as accessible as possible. In the long run, this approach is consistent with Government thinking and will help foster public confidence in the police."

She notes that "a rubbing point" with the media is the tendency of police staff to wrongly apply the Data Protection and Human Rights Acts when refusing to give information.

She makes clear the Data Protection Act does not apply to dead people. "Giving bad or wrong reasons for withholding information is damaging and not conducive to good media relations," she says.

Neville also stresses: "Some forces take the view that the media do not have a right to information and that the provision of news stories is discretionary.

"However, it is not for the police to decide what the public have a right to know, or to try and reduce fear of crime by not giving out information about crimes that have been committed."

Society of Editors executive director Bob Satchwell has welcomed the letter.

"She is not giving us everything we want but has listened and accepted there are problems. By and large the letter is helpful and positive and something editors can use if they have problems with the police," he said.

By Jon Slattery

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network