View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
June 12, 2014updated 13 Jun 2014 1:25pm

Paul Weller’s wife calls for criminal offence to protect children from ‘prying eyes of press’

By PA Media Lawyer

The wife of singer Paul Weller has called for a change in the law to protect children from media intrusion.

Hannah Weller said she wanted other parents to join her and "take a stand for all our children".

She made her call outside the High Court in London, where earlier this year the family won £10,000 in privacy damages from Mail Online over pictures of their children, said: "We're calling for a change in the law to give children better protection from the prying eyes of the press. It should be a criminal offence to violate any child's right to grow up free from media intrusion."

Her husband, the 55-year-old former frontman of The Jam and The Style Council, sued Associated Newspapers for misuse of private information on behalf of daughter Dylan, who was 16 when the seven unpixellated pictures appeared on MailOnline in October 2012, and twin sons John-Paul and Bowie, who were 10 months old.

The pictures – which were removed from Mail Online after the family complained – were published after a paparazzo photographer followed Weller and his children on a shopping trip through the streets of Santa Monica, California, taking pictures without their consent despite being asked to stop.

It was made clear during the court case that the photographer was doing nothing illegal under California law.

Hannah Weller said: "I am here today because we as parents decided to make a stand against this threatening, aggressive and abusive behaviour and when we did, the judge agreed with us that publishing photographs of children without parental consent is against the law.

"Thanks to our legal team, newspaper editors will think twice before publishing photographs of our children in the future.

"The law is now clear but sadly, it is not properly enforced. Many newspaper publishers continue to compromise the safety and privacy of children.

"As it stands, the decision about whether or not to thrust children into the media spotlight lies with the discretion of the editors of money-hungry newspapers and online gossip websites who are often more concerned with their own bottom line than the best interests of children.

"These people have shown repeatedly that they cannot be trusted to make the right choices and so it is time to take this decision from them and make it a criminal offence to expose children in this way. Children deserve special protection from the prying eyes of the press."

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly dose of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network