A High Court judge sat in public to explain why he was hearing a case listed as "ABC v DEF" in private.
The case was listed only by letters before Mr Justice Birss in the chancery division of the High Court in London – and "in private" signs were posted on court doors when the hearing started on 17 September.
But the judge agreed to start the hearing in open court after a journalist asked for an explanation – and then went into private session.
Mr Justice Birss said the case involved a housing association and he said he was dealing with an application for asset freezing orders.
The judge said there was good reason for hearing the application at a private hearing and a good reason for the parties involved being anonymised.
But he added that it was "right and proper" for the press to ask why cases were listed in such a fashion and heard in private.
Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog