
The recent High Court ruling on ERY v Associated Newspapers concerns a very wealthy businessman who wants to stop the public knowing that he has been questioned by police under caution.
Before an interview is given under caution, the police must be satisfied that there are reasonable, objective grounds to suspect the interviewee of an offence, based on known facts or information.
ERY’s company is being investigated for financial crime.
You've reached your limit of free articles
Please register now to continue reading
Already registered? Log in here