View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
November 26, 2010

Mail Online’s meagre revenue dwarfed by turnover from Associated’s print businesses

By Dominic Ponsford1

I was pretty revved up about the online future of the UK’s national press after Mail Online publisher Martin Clarke’s barn-storming Society of Editors speech last week.

He said his website was poised to challenge the dominance of the BBC when it comes to online news, revealing that it now attracts more than fifty million unique users globally – a stupendous figure.

So I was pretty deflated to read in DMGT’s annual results that all those unique users (Mail Online was the top national newspaper website for most of its financial year) only equated to revenue (that’s revenue rather than profit) of £12m.

That compares with total revenue across the Mail on Sunday, Daily Mail and Metro businesses of £850m.

So the second biggest newspaper website in the world by volume is nowhere near sustainable on its own.

When I asked DMGT for an explanation over this apparently very low figure – they said they were just pleased with the rate of growth and the high number of unique users.

Mail Online digital income is growing fast. They may be focusing on building the traffic up before then working out how to monetise it. And Clarke hinted at new retail and paid-for services to be launched next year.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

But that £12m figure certainly suggests that sheer volume doesn’t get you far commercially as a news website. When the cost of sales and other overheads are factored in it doesn’t pay for a whole lot of journalists – perhaps it is enough to support a twentieth the number who work on the print titles?

Compare these figures to www.guardian.co.uk. Speaking in May, Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger revealed expected online revenues of £40m – this from a website which nowadays has around two thirds the traffic of Mail Online.

The moral of the story? The Guardian’s strategy of providing in-depth information in vertical markets – such as media, environment, society, education and so on – is a lot more lucrative than the Mail’s showbiz-fuelled race for readers. So far anyway.

For more in-depth analysis on the DMGT figures – see Peter Kirwan’s Media Money blog.

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network