View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
September 5, 2016updated 07 Sep 2016 10:49am

Law Commission says ‘vague’ and ‘unclear’ misconduct offence used against journalists and their sources must be reformed

By Dominic Ponsford

The offence of misconduct in public office, used with devastating consequences for journalists and their sources in recent years, should be reformed or abolished according to the Law Commission.

The body which provides advice for the Government is currently consulting on changing the ancient common law offence, which it says fell largely into disuse in the late 18th century – but was resurrected by police and the Crown Prosecution Service in the early 21st century.

The Met’s Operation Elveden saw 34 journalists arrested and/or charged with the offence from between 2011 and 2015 over payments to public employees for stories. Around 30 sources were convicted but just one conviction of a journalist at trial stands.

The Law Commission said that holding “public office” lacks clear definition yet is a critical element of the offence.

It also said that abuse of the public’s trust” is crucial in acting as a threshold element of the offence, “but is so vague that it is difficult for investigators, prosecutors and juries to apply”.

Professor David Ormerod QC, law commissioner for criminal law, said: “It
is vital that the public have confidence in their public officials and
in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct.

“The offence of misconduct in public office is increasingly being used
to bring public officials to account but recent high-profile
investigations and prosecutions have brought the problems with this
offence into sharp focus.”

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

He added: “The existing law relating to misconduct in public office is
unclear in a number of fundamental respects.

“There is urgent need for reform to bring clarity and certainty and
ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for
misconduct committed in connection with their official duties.”

The Commission suggested a new statutory offence to remove ambiguity.

A consultation paper from the independent advisory body proposes two
possible forms an offence could take  – a breach of duty model where the
breach must lead to a risk of serious harm, and a corruption-based model
including the abuse of a position for personal advantage or to cause
harm to another.

The breach of duty offence would apply to public office holders whose
positions carry powers of physical coercion such as arrest, detention or
imprisonment, or have functions specifically relating to protecting
vulnerable people from harm. The corruption-based model offence would
apply to all holders of public office.

The consultation document explores options for a more rigorous definition of public office – such as a list of specific positions or public functions, or a general definition supported by examples.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “We welcome this consultation
paper and will respond to the recommendations in the final report.”

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network