View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
August 26, 2004updated 22 Nov 2022 11:58am

Judge backs down following challenge by Mercury reporter

By Press Gazette

A Leicester Mercury reporter has successfully challenged a judge who expelled him from a “neighbour from hell” hearing.

District Judge Richard Merriman told Tom Pegden to leave about 25 minutes into the case at Leicester County Court.

The civil case was brought by Leicester City Council’s Anti-Social Behaviour Unit which had applied for possession of a council flat rented by David Doughty.

The court heard that Doughty had made life a misery for his neighbours with his late night arguments and loud music.

When the judge realised Pegden was in court, he told him the case was being heard in private, comparing it to a rent arrears possession hearing.

The reporter left the court but, after checking with McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists and the Mercury’s lawyers, came back and asked the judge to reconsider. Court was adjourned for five minutes, and then District Judge Merriman admitted he had been wrong.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

The judge ruled the council could take possession of Doughty’s flat and the story made page three of the Leicester Mercury.

Pegden had been ready to argue that getting the story in the paper was in the public interest.

He said: “It was irritating being asked to stand up and explain who I was and then being told to leave a court, which I knew I had every right to be in.

“The case involved someone who had been a public nuisance for two years, which made me even more determined to talk my way back in.

“I checked McNae’s, which said property possessions for mortgage and rent arrears were held in chambers, but said nothing about cases like this.

“I rang the Mercury’s lawyers. They agreed that there was no reason why a case like this should be held behind closed doors.

“Because it was in chambers I had to get the clerk to ring the courtroom and ask if I could go back in again. I was given a chance to approach the judge and tell him I was unhappy with his ruling and he adjourned the case. Five minutes later he came back, said he had checked the law, and said I could stay.”

Mercury editor Nick Carter said: “This is a classic example of a reporter standing their ground in the public interest and forcing a judge to reconsider.

Tom did exactly the right thing.”

By Jon Slattery

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network