Update 5 January 2022:
IPSO has declined a request to launch a standards investigation into the Jewish Chronicle.
- November 24, 2021
- November 8, 2021
- August 12, 2021
The regulator’s chairman Lord Faulks told a group of complainants it would not be “proportionate” to launch an investigation before the impact of recent training given to Jewish Chronicle staff can be assessed.
He also pointed to the newspaper’s 2020 change of ownership and recent changes in editorial leadership. Stephen Pollard stepped down as editor after 13 years last month, and was succeeded by his deputy Jake Wallis Simons.
In an email, Lord Faulks said concerns about the Jewish Chronicle’s compliance with the Editors’ Code and its handling of complaints have been “continuously monitored” by IPSO since early 2018.
He wrote in December: “The executive decided targeted training to all members of the editorial team would be an appropriate and proportionate course of action to remedy the concerns identified. A specially tailored training programme conducted in cooperation with the editorial leadership of the Jewish Chronicle has been developed and delivered during the course of this year. The publication has cooperated fully with these efforts, ensuring that staff attended the sessions conducted by IPSO.
“Taking this into account, along with the size of the publication and the changes of ownership and personnel it has undergone during the relevant period, it is the board’s decision that it would not be proportionate to launch a standards investigation at this time before the effects of the training programme and the other changes at the Jewish Chronicle can be fully assessed.”
Lord Faulks added that IPSO’s executive would conduct a review in six months to check whether the training and other changes “have been embedded in the Jewish Chronicle’s editorial practices” and report back to the board with a view on whether any further action from the regulator is required.
The group of complainants said in a statement that the decision not to launch an investigation “sends the message to IPSO members that no behaviour by them could ever be bad enough to prompt even a formal investigation, let alone disciplinary action”.
Original story 6 August 2021:
The Independent Press Standards Organisation has been asked to use its powers to launch a standards investigation into the Jewish Chronicle.
The press regulator has never yet instigated a standards investigation, its most serious potential action, since its inception seven years ago.
Nine people who won libel or IPSO complaints against the Jewish Chronicle in the past three years have written to the regulator asking it to consider taking the action to tackle what they allege are “systemic” issues.
Between July 2018 and July 2021 the weekly newspaper paid out and apologised in four libel cases.
Most recently, expelled Labour activist Marc Wadsworth was falsely accused of being involved in a group planning to target Jewish people in the Labour Party. Mrs Justice Collins Rice, who oversaw the public apology, said: “This was a serious mistake for the Jewish Chronicle to have made.”
In the same time period IPSO upheld, at least in part, nine complaints about the Jewish Chronicle relating to Clause 1 (accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice, to which all IPSO members are signed up.
Of the other complaints IPSO formally investigated in those three years, it chose not to uphold six and its mediation helped to resolve a further two.
Press Gazette understands around 40 complaints did not reach the IPSO investigation stage, for reasons that could include being resolved amicably with the newspaper or because the regulator did not consider there were any potential breaches of the code.
IPSO, which regulates most of the UK’s traditional national and regional newspaper brands, has not yet launched any standards investigations since its creation in 2014 to replace the Press Complaints Commission.
IPSO says this action is reserved for when it has “serious concerns” about the actions or behaviour of a member publisher, including “serious and systemic” breaches of the Editors’ Code.
The most serious penalties within IPSO’s powers include a fine of up to £1m, ordering the payment of reasonable costs for the investigation, and membership termination.
IPSO did carry out training for Jewish Chronicle staff on compliance with the Editors’ Code of Practice last month.
Nine of the legal and IPSO complainants, most of whom are connected to the Labour Party in some way, co-signed a letter to IPSO chairman Lord Faulks, who replaced Sir Alan Moses in January 2020.
They said the upheld rulings of the past three years make it “clear that the paper’s editorial standards are shockingly low and IPSO’s actions to date have made no difference”.
“We have all either seen our complaints to IPSO about the Jewish Chronicle’s bad journalism upheld or secured admissions of libel from the paper. Unless standards there improve there will be more victims, while readers will continue to be misled,” they said in a letter published by Jo Bird, a Labour councillor in Wirral who won a complaint against the paper on a point of accuracy last month.
In June Jewish Chronicle readers’ editor Richard Burton wrote in response to one of the IPSO complaints in question, pointing out that it was only upheld on one accuracy point while several other arguments were dismissed.
The group’s request has been received by IPSO’s standards department, which will decide what action, if any, is proportionate. Short of a full standards investigation this can include further staff training, raising specific concerns, or targeted monitoring.
Any decision to launch a standards investigation would ultimately be a matter for the IPSO board which, led by Lord Faulks, usually meets six times per year.
A spokesperson for the regulator told Press Gazette: “IPSO can undertake a standards investigation where it has serious concerns about the behaviour or actions of one of its regulated publishers.
“These concerns could include serious and systemic breaches of the Editors’ Code; where a publisher’s annual compliance statement raises significant concerns; or in exceptional circumstances, because of substantial legal issues or Editors’ Code compliance issues.
“IPSO actively monitors complaints, compliance with the Editors’ Code and the wider media landscape to ensure publishers uphold the highest possible standards.
“We aim to take action to address issues of concern in a proportionate way, ideally at an early stage. IPSO recently delivered training on Editors’ Code compliance to staff at the Jewish Chronicle, a service which is available to all regulated publishers.
“IPSO’s board makes any decision about whether or not to launch a standards investigation after careful consideration of all available evidence.”
The Jewish Chronicle declined to comment for this story.
Full statement from IPSO on 5 January 2021:
IPSO has the power to launch a standards investigation, its most serious sanction, where there are exceptional concerns about the behaviour or actions of one of its regulated publishers. This could include serious and systemic breaches of the Editors’ Code; where a publisher’s annual compliance statement raises significant concerns; or in specific circumstances, because of substantial legal or Code compliance issues.
It is important that any regulatory intervention is appropriate, proportionate and in line with IPSO’s regulations. IPSO’s Board has carefully considered the concerns raised about editorial standards at the Jewish Chronicle. It has decided that it would not be proportionate to launch such an investigation at this time.
Although the Board noted issues with the Jewish Chronicle’s compliance with the Editors’ Code, the publication has engaged with extensive specialist training in the past six months and there have been changes in ownership and personnel during the relevant period. A review will be conducted in six months to assess whether the training and other changes have been embedded in the Jewish Chronicle’s editorial practices and to consider whether any further action is required.
As the independent regulator of most newspapers and magazines in the UK, IPSO actively monitors complaints, compliance with the Editors’ Code and the wider media landscape to ensure regulated publishers uphold the highest possible standards.