View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
June 15, 2015

IPSO begins process of creating low cost libel and privacy arbitration scheme

By Dominic Ponsford

The Independent Press Standards Organisation has begun the process of setting up a low cost arbitration scheme for settling libel and privacy claims.

Such a scheme was among the recommendations in the Leveson report of November 2012.

An arbitration scheme has been strongly resisted by some regional newspaper publishers who fear it will lead to an increase in claims.

IPSO has launched a consultation on setting up the arbitration scheme, which will run until 7 September.

The consultation document suggests that both publishers and claimants would pay an admin fee of perhaps £250 before entering arbitration.

The document states that the rest of the arbitrator’s cost “associated with making a substantive determination” will be covered by the publisher. However these costs would be recoverable against the claimant however if their claim was struck out.

It has been suggested that arbitration claims could be limited to £25,000 and that some publishers in IPSO could opt out of the scheme.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

If IPSO decides to press on with arbitration after the consultation it will begin with a pilot scheme.

IPSO chairman Sir Alan Moses said: “Arbitration is not just about reducing costs and delays associated with litigation, it is about widening access to justice for members of the public and is something I feel very strongly about.

“At the core of IPSO’s work is that we will support complainants who feel wronged by the press and this consultation asks for views on how an arbitration scheme could be part of that provision. I look forward to receiving responses from the public as well as the industry and commentators.”

In his report Leveson said, in recommendation 22: "The process should be fair, quick and inexpensive, inquisitorial and free for complainant s to use (save for a power to make an adverse order for the costs of the arbitrator if proceedings are frivolous or vexatious)."

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network