View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

View from inside the Old Bailey: Dan Evans says he is telling the truth now so he can look his kids in the eye

By Darren Boyle

Dan Evans sat in the witness stand for his third day of evidence. Dressed like any self respecting tabloid journalist with cuff links showing from beneath his brown suit and freshly pressed white shirt, he sipped on a glass of water.

Less than 20 feet away sat Andy Coulson, who the court heard previously after a breakfast of smoked salmon and scrambled eggs took only ten minutes to offer Evans a job at the News of the World.

Now, amid the wood-panelled walls of court 12 at the Old Bailey, Evans said he wanted to come clean, so he could look his kids in the eye. He wanted a fresh start. He had, he admitted, wanted full immunity once he started helping the police.

Coulson remained impassive as Evans spoke, tapping away on his MacBook Air. Two seats further down, Clive Goodman, his half-moon spectacles sitting on the bridge of his nose, used a quality pen and pad to take a note of proceedings. Unremarkably, both men also wore cufflinks. Only Mark Hanna, former News International security chief, sitting in the corner, appeared to fasten his shirt with a conventional button.

Coulson’s barrister Timothy Langdale QC began his cross-examination briskly,  soon eliciting that Evans’ first prepared statement to police was pure “cobblers” and had been “maintaining a lie”. He also secured an admission that Evans had not been truthful in an earlier civil court case.

The barrister said Evans had made no comment during police questioning, stressing to the jury that this was his right.

Yet, Evans managed to say that Detective Constable O’Mahoney “was a very aggressive interviewer”.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Langdale’s modulated tones contrasted starkly with Evans' north London accent.

In what became known as the “sticky keys defence” Langdale claimed Evans was happy to blame others for his own mistakes.

He replied that he was simply “toeing the party line”, claiming “I bitterly regret I did not take a braver course of action at the time”. Evans claimed that the sticky keys referred to a problem he was having with his Nokia N95.

He said he was now being fully open and transparent.

Probing, Langdale suggested: “You are prone to make sweeping assertions that are not based on fact?”

Instantly, Evans replied: “That is not true, sir.”

The jury of nine women and three men were then brought through the intricacies of the Serious and Organised Crime Police Act of 2005.

Langdale quizzed Evans on his motives for helping the prosecution. “You were seeking immunity, complete immunity from any offence?”

“In an ideal world, yes,” he replied, taking another sip from his glass of water.

The jury heard how Evans was debriefed for three days by senior officers under the belief that full immunity from prosecution was possible under Section 71 of the Act.

Yet, Langdale said the Crown Prosecution Service decided against immunity because Evans’ value as a witness would be “almost worthless” and “extremely vulnerable to charges that he had made up evidence … weakening the prosecution case”.

With no offer of complete immunity, Evans said: “I had enough of being used as football in this particular game.”

However, on 23 August 2013, Evans admitted that he signed an agreement with the CPS under Section 73 where he had to admit to his crimes, give evidence in court when required. For this, he will receive consideration when it came to sentencing.

“I now know that Section 71 is only available when people’s lives are at risk or when national security is being threatened. It is for saving lives.”

All of the defendants deny all of the charges.

The trial continues.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network