View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
December 12, 2012

How to stay safe when reporting previous convictions

By Cleland Thom

Journalists sometimes phone me and say: "I’m covering a crown court trial, and they’ve just mentioned the bloke’s previous convictions! How can that be right?"

In fact, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 allows the judge to mention someone’s previous convictions, an any ‘reprehensible behaviour’ to the jury.

The prosecution must apply for this step to be taken, and can only do so if the previous convictions / behaviour are connected with the same offence.

So if a man is accused assaulting his wife, his previous convictions for domestic violence may well be revealed to the jury. But if he had previous convictions for another type of assault, such as grievous bodily harm, these would probably not be revealed.

The exception is if someone is charged with a sex crime against a child. Then they may have their previous convictions for downloading child pornography revealed.

The jury are excluded while the prosecution’s application is heard. The press can remain, but if the application is rejected, the they cannot report that it was made – for obvious reasons.

The law is used to prevent this type of thing:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8973998/Stephen-Lawrence-murder-jurors-did-not-know-about-Gary-Dobson-and-David-Norriss-violent-past.html

Here’s a recent example of it in action:

https://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Man-John-Suddards-murder-case-previous/story-17044860-detail/story.html

One potential danger is when the media knows from its archives that a person who has just been charged has previous convictions for the same offence.

It’s tempting to assume the judge will therefore allow the jury to hear about them, and publish them before the trial.

The best advice is: Don’t risk it, especially with Dominic Grieve, the current Attorney General in charge of media contempt prosecutions. He’s rather free with his summonses.

You would probably be safe mentioning previous convictions if a man was on the run, and a warrant hadn’t been issued. Then the Contempt of Court Act wouldn’t apply. But you could still be prosecuted under common law contempt if Mr Grieve considered you’d been reckless.

I wouldn’t bet against it!

Cleland Thom is a consultant and trainer in media law

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly dose of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network