View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
March 31, 2010

PG election poll: ‘Public are influenced by journalists, whether they believe it or not’

By Nicole Canning

Pollsters have suggested that a new survey revealing that nine out of ten Britons believe their general election voting decision will be unaffected by any particular news organisation should be taken with a pinch of salt.

The survey, which appears in the April edition of Press Gazette, asked a weighted sample of 1,000 members of the British public whether one particular broadcaster, publication or website will affect their voting decision at the next general election. Ninety per cent said they are not affected by the media when deciding who to vote for.

But Paul Dixon, global managing director at iCD Research, who conducted the survey for Press Gazette, said: “It is important to take consumer-stated intention in any research with a grain of salt. While 90 per cent of the public might consciously state that they won’t be influenced by media when it comes to political voting, they are unaware of subconscious factors and influences”.

He said that iCD have conducted numerous surveys in the past to research public voting habits and the perceptions of political parties and leaders. In a recent investigation, iCD discovered that the top three words associated with David Cameron were “smarmy, false and snobby”. Similarly, a majority described Gordon Brown as “boring”.

“Our qualitative tracking of political intention and opinions of party leaders has shown the impact of media influences and from past experience we believe that the closer to the election, the more influenced the consumer can be, whether they believe it or not”, he said.

Anthony Wells is a political commentator for YouGov, a national opinion pollster organisation. Wells is also the author of the UK Polling Report website.

He said that the survey “almost certainly underestimates the impact of political reporting”.

He said: “The real impact is more subconscious, the long term drip-drip of positive or negative coverage.”

Matthew Festenstein, professor of politics at the University of York, said of political polling: “It is easy to say what you think but harder to assess where your thoughts have come from.”

He added: “It is very easy to say that their votes won’t be changed by what was published but people have to get their information from somewhere and that is what the media does. So it comes back to where your opinions came from in the first place.”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly dose of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network