Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. The Wire
September 7, 2022

Libel | James Dyson launches libel action against Channel 4/ITN

Sir James Dyson and his companies have launched libel action against Channel 4 and ITN at the High Court in London

Update 29 August 2024: Dyson abandons Channel 4 News libel claim

7/10/22: Sir James Dyson and his companies Dyson Technology and Dyson Limited launched libel action against Channel 4 and ITN, the producer of Channel 4 News, at the High Court in London on Thursday.

He is bringing the case over a Channel 4 News broadcast on 10 February that made allegations of abuse and exploitation of workers at a Malaysian factory that used to supply goods to Dyson.

Dyson argued the broadcast falsely said he and his companies were complicit in systematic abuse and exploitation of the workers.

Mr Justice Nicklin was asked to decide several preliminary issues in the claim, including whether the two companies were referred to in the broadcast and if the programme defamed them and Dyson.

Hugh Tomlinson KC, for Dyson and the companies, argued that a claimant does not need to be referred to by name for the programme to be defamatory.

Adam Wolanski KC, for Channel 4 and ITN, argued that the two Dyson companies were not referred to in the programme.

“There is nothing in the words in the broadcast that identifies the second claimant or the third claimant and that is the end of it,” he told the court.

The barrister added that if the two companies were the ones referred to, the programme featured issues of opinion rather than factual allegations against them.

“The broadcast raises the question as to whether Dyson is responsible for abuses of labour rights at a company within its supply chain,” Wolanski said in written submissions. “This question is inherently recognisable to the viewer as a matter of opinion.”

Wolanski also argued that the broadcast did not defame Sir James, saying in written submissions that there is “no suggestion whatsoever in the broadcast that [he] has any knowledge of or culpability for Dyson’s relationship with its supplier”.

Mr Justice Nicklin will give his decision on the preliminary issues in writing at a later date.

Picture: Shutterstock

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Websites in our network