View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. Digital Journalism
August 24, 2015updated 25 Aug 2015 5:39pm

UK Information Commissioner orders Google to remove links to news reports about ‘right to be forgotten’ complaint

By Dominic Ponsford

The UK Information Commissioner has ordered Google to remove links detailing an individual’s criminal conviction in the light of the European “right to be forgotten ruling”.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is charged under the Data Protection Act with ensuring that data is processed “fairly and lawfully”.

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled last year that individuals have the right to request the removal of links to articles about them from search engines if they feel it breaches their right to privacy.

The ruling has seen thousands of news articles removed from Google search archive in Europe.

The latest ruling from the ICO follows a complaint from an un-named person who successfully asked Google to remove a link to a website report of a criminal conviction.

Their criminal conviction was then relisted on Google via a news story reporting on the successful ‘right to be forgotten’ request.

The individual concerned then asked Google to remove links to this and other follow-up news reports.

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

According to the ICO, Google refused to do so “on the grounds that the search links were still relevant and in the public interest”.

It also resisted a request from the ICO that it remove the links, arguing that the article “former an essential part of a recent news story relating to a matter of significant public interest”.

The ICO said it decided to take enforcement action ordering Google to remove the links because:

  • "This is not a case where the information is about an individual in public life or where making the information available would protect the public from improper or unprofessional conduct"
  • The information is not “reasonably current” because it relates to a conviction which is almost ten years old
  • The links are having a negative impact on the complainant’s privacy because they relate to a “relatively minor offence” for which they received a two-year conditional discharge.

Google now has 35 days to remove the nine relevant story links.

Topics in this article : ,

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network