View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. Broadcast Journalism
May 24, 2013updated 25 May 2013 2:37am

Sun and ITV defend ‘public interest’ in showing Woolwich terror video Sky judged too ‘distressing’

By Gavriel Hollander

News organisations have defended their decisions to broadcast controversial video footage shot in the immediate aftermath of the Woolwich terror attack.

The Sun and ITN both obtained videos from members of the public on Wednesday showing one of the attackers brandishing what appears to be a meat cleaver and delivering a politically-charged diatribe moments after he murdered a soldier.

Both videos were later shown on the BBC, with the vast majority of national papers carrying still images from the footage on Thursday’s front pages. ITV, Ofcom and the BBC are understood to have received hundreds of complaints about the decision to air the footage.

Sun managing editor Richard Caseby said that choosing to release the video was “a very difficult decision” but was swayed by the “huge public interest” in the story.

“The editor had close discussions with his backbench team about the treatment of the video and the stills in the print edition,” Caseby told Press Gazette.

“This was very graphic and disturbing content – only this time it was on a suburban English street, not a distant Al Qaeda stronghold.

“Was it too graphic? Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages?

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

“These are difficult moral dilemmas played out against tight deadlines, intense competition and a desire to be respectful to the dead and their loved ones.

“But there was a huge public interest in publishing this video, which showed the aftermath of the attack – there was no film of the attack itself. This was in broad daylight and was witnessed by scores of people. It was also important to show how this terrible act appeared to represent a sea change in terror activity in the UK.”

ITN, which was the first organisation to release footage, said it was “editorially justified” to show the film during the 6.30pm broadcast of ITV News.

Both ITV and the BBC issued warnings to viewers before running the footage. Sky News, however, opted not to screen the video.

John McAndrew, executive editor at Sky News, said: “We assessed the video at a senior editorial level – several times. Given the detail we had already learned about the attack, we took the decision not to run the video as we believed it would have been unnecessarily distressing.”

A spokesperson for ITV News said: “We carefully considered showing this footage ahead of broadcast and made the decision to do so on a public interest basis as the material is integral to understanding the horrific incident that took place yesterday.

“It was editorially justified to show such footage in the aftermath of such a shocking attack, and we prefaced it on ITV News at 6.30pm and News at Ten with appropriate warnings to make viewers aware in advance of the graphic images about to be shown.”

Neither The Sun nor ITV News would say whether they paid for their footage.

The video sent ITV’s website into meltdown when it was first uploaded on Wednesday afternoon. The site crashed as people flocked to watch the video though a spokesperson said it was up and running again “within half an hour”.

ITV News said its website attracted 1.2 million unique users on 22 May – the day of the attack. This compares to an average of 860,000 unique users a week so far in 2013.

On Thursday, almost all national papers splashed on images taken from the videos. Only the Daily Express opted out, running a photo of the Duchess of Cambridge instead.

The pictures sparked heated debate on social media. A poll on the Media Blog website showed that 56 per cent of more than 1,100 respondents thought the newspapers were wrong to run the images, with only 36 per cent thinking it was the right thing to do.

Meanwhile, today the Daily Mirror today broadcast new footage showing a shoot-out between police and the two knifemen involved in the attack.

Topics in this article : , , ,

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network