View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Ofcom upholds complaint from Met Police on Channel 4 News coverage of Ellison Review

By PA Media Lawyer

Channel 4 News breached broadcasting rules over its coverage of the Ellison Review into possible police corruption around the Stephen Lawrence case, according to communications watchdog Ofcom.

The Metropolitan Police complained about a section of the programme featuring a reporter interviewing members of the public about the issue.

It said the interviews were presented as being "chosen randomly", but in fact "the individuals were employees of an organisation (Livity4) for which the reporter had worked and which … had also worked for Channel 4".

The broadcaster told Ofcom it "accepted that this particular report fell below the normal standards of Channel 4 News" and said it was "caused by poor judgment by a junior reporter".

Ofcom said broadcasters had a "fundamental obligation … to ensure that audiences are not misled by the manner in which news is presented" and "breaches of this nature are amongst the most serious that can be committed by a broadcaster because they go to the heart of the relationship of trust between a broadcaster and its audience".

An Ofcom spokesman said: "Following a detailed investigation, Ofcom found Channel 4 breached broadcasting rules for not presenting its news coverage of the Ellison Review, which looked at possible corruption in the Metropolitan Police Service, with due accuracy.

"The reporter presented a series of vox pop-style interviews for a story in Brixton, with people chosen seemingly at random who gave views that were critical of the police. However, it did not make clear that these people were in fact pre-selected and had ties to the reporter."

Content from our partners
Cannes Lions: The world's best creativity all in one place
L'Equipe signs content syndication deal with The Content Exchange
Journalism can be relentless: But overworking could be fatal

A Channel 4 spokeswoman said: "Ofcom accepted that all the individuals interviewed in this brief report were expressing their own genuinely held opinions on camera, which reflected similarly held views by many others – and has ruled that the overall 20-minute item about the Ellison review was duly impartial.

"Whilst we do not agree that the audience was misled in any meaningful way, we accept that the reporter's methodology was flawed – it was an error of judgment and we broadcast an apology and clarification about this within a week on Channel 4 News."

Topics in this article : , , ,

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network