View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
January 25, 2021updated 30 Sep 2022 9:58am

Google ‘confident’ third-party cookie alternatives are right for ads and privacy

By PA Media

Google has said it is confident that proposals to scrap third-party cookies on its Chrome browser are right for the web despite questions about the impact it could have on sites dependent on them for revenue.

The tech giant is pressing ahead with the move despite concerns from publishers and an ongoing investigation by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority regulator.

Google has now set out a number of alternatives that it believes are the best way forward for advertising without tracking users’ behaviour across the web.

Improving privacy has been the main argument for the move – known as the Privacy Sandbox project – since it was first revealed a year ago.

The firm wants to phase out support for third-party cookies by 2022, in line with other internet browsers, but online publishers such as newspapers are concerned this could distort competition and create a “Google-owned walled garden”.

[Read more: How Google is building an internet without cookies – and why publishers are concerned]

Speaking to press on Monday, Chetna Bindra, Google’s group product manager of user trust and privacy, said: “We are really more confident than ever this is the best path to improve privacy for web users and ensure an ad-supported web.”

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

One of the ideas the company is pursing, known as FLoC (Federated Learning of Cohorts), groups users who have similar browsing behaviours, essentially hiding individuals within a crowd.

Testing is set to begin in March, though the firm stresses that no final decision has yet been made.

Google said such changes will also impact its own advertising products.

[Sign up for Press Gazette’s must-read newsletters: Media Monitor (strategic insight every Thursday), PG Daily and Marketing Matters]

Marketers for an Open Web, a group of newspaper publishers and technology companies which complained to the CMA about the changes, said Google’s claims of collaboration and openness are “disingenuous”.

“Privacy Sandbox is trying to replace an open and interoperable technology with one that is Google controlled,” a spokesperson said.

“This will force marketers into their walled garden and will spell the end of the independent and open web.

“Google’s proposals are bad for independent media owners, bad for independent advertising technology and bad for advertisers.

“The people who will be most significantly affected by this will be smaller local publishers and independent businesses – they will effectively be cut out of the open online advertising marketplace causing devastating damage to their businesses.”

They continued: “This is a monopolistic player attempting to consolidate their dominance by degrading the open web using privacy and collaboration as a veil of legitimacy.

“Requiring people to surrender directly identifiable, personal information like their email address, name, phone number, and search history to a handful of trillion dollar businesses operating an oligopoly does nothing to improve people’s privacy in practice.”

Picture: Shutterstock

Topics in this article : ,

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network