View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
August 7, 2019updated 30 Sep 2022 8:11am

Met Police blames ‘communication error’ for claim press could not identify dead woman

By James Walker

The Metropolitan Police has blamed a “communication error” for wrongly claiming that reporting restrictions prevented the press from identifying an alleged murder victim.

The force issued a press release earlier today reporting that a 22-year-old man had been charged with the alleged murder and rape of an elderly woman at her home in Haringey.

It wrongly added that magistrates had placed reporting restrictions on the identification of the woman.

Following the charge hearing at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court today, the Met wrote: “We are advised that magistrates imposed reporting restrictions preventing the identification of the victim.”

The Met was also careful not to name the woman in its release.

One journalist derided the decision as “farcical” on social media while another pointed out there was no law to protect the identity of the dead.

But the Met has since updated the story with the full name and picture of 89-year-old Dorothy Woolmer (pictured).

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The London Magistrates Courts and the Met both told Press Gazette that there were never any reporting restrictions on the case.

A Met spokeswoman said the false guidance in its press release was the result of a “communication error” and said the force would be sending a note to the media on the matter.

Independent home affairs and security correspondent Lizzie Dearden tweeted: “There appears to have been some confusion around rape victims’ right to automatic anonymity.

“The anonymity ceases to automatically apply when a victim dies, as in this alleged murder case.

“Any journalist in court would have said as much when the discussion was had between police, court clerk and CPS, but we didn’t know the hearing was taking place. Farcical.”

Picture: Met Police

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network