View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
May 8, 2014

Supreme Court upholds ban on media naming deported sex offender

By PA Media Lawyer

The BBC has lost its appeal to the Supreme Court over a ban on journalists naming an immigrant who was deported after being jailed for gross indecency with a child.

Corporation lawyers argued that a Scottish court was wrong to bar foreign national "A" from being identified after he said he would be at risk of "life threatening" violence when he returned home.

But a panel of five Supreme Court justices – deputy president Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge – unanimously upheld the ban.

The 47-year-old man arrived in the UK in 1991 and was later granted indefinite leave to remain after marrying a British woman.

In 1996, he was jailed for four years for indecent assault on a woman and sexual offences against a child and was ordered by the Home Secretary to be deported at the end of his sentence.

Lawyers said the man's name and picture had been published in coverage which followed his conviction.

Lord Reed said: "This appeal raises important issues concerning the principle of open justice."

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

The BBC was challenging an anonymity order made by the Court of Session in judicial review proceedings stemming form a tribunal's decision to go ahead with deportation.

The case concerned the legal basis for departing from the principle of open justice and the procedure which should be followed.

Lord Reed said: "A is now residing in the country where, as the tribunal concluded, he is at risk of serious violence if his identity becomes known in connection with these proceedings.

"His application for judicial review of the tribunal's decision to authorise his deportation has not yet been heard.

"In these circumstances, it is appropriate both in the interests of justice, and in order to protect A's safety, that his identity should continue to be withheld in connection with these proceedings, and that the order should therefore remain in place."


Topics in this article :

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network