View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
September 27, 2012updated 28 Sep 2012 2:12pm

Local weeklies censured by PCC over ‘model pix cop’ agency story

By Andrew Pugh

Two weekly newspapers have been criticised by the Press Complaints Commission after the watchdog said it was “deeply concerned” with their handling of a complaint from a former police officer.

Rebecca Morris complained to the PCC over a story headlined “Model pix cop has quit force” that appeared in the Stourbridge News and its sister title the Halesowen News, claiming the PCSO  had left the police following press reports about photographs of her modelling.

At the heart of the complaint was her denial that she was “carving out a second career as a motor show promotions model”.

Morris insisted that she not been paid for the photographs that appeared online, which she said had been taken as part of a hobby, and felt the article inaccurately suggested she left the job because of the publicity surrounding the pictures.

Both newspapers took 45 days to provide an initial response to the complaint.  

In their defence, they said the article was based on agency copy and so it “therefore could not provide any details about the journalist’s newsgathering methods”.

They also denied having published any inaccuracies and did not accept that the article suggested Morris had left her job because of  press coverage

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The papers also “maintained that the complainant had promoted herself as a model seeking paid employment in that field”.

The complaint under Article 1 (accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice was upheld.

In its adjudication the PCC said:

The complainant had raised a number of significant concerns about the accuracy of the story. The Commission noted that the newspaper stood by its story.

However, it had provided its initial comments on the complaint only after a delay of over six weeks, and it had not provided evidence to corroborate the disputed claims, including most substantively that the complainant had been “carving out a second career” as a model, or to demonstrate that it had taken care, as required by Clause 1 (Accuracy), not to publish inaccurate or misleading information.

The Commission was deeply concerned by the newspaper’s handling of the complaint: it had failed to provide a substantive response within a reasonable timeframe, and it had suggested in correspondence that it could not comment on the newsgathering methods employed by the agency that had supplied the copy.Local 

The preamble to the Code makes clear that editors must “co-operate swiftly with the PCC in the resolution of complaints” and further that they should take care to ensure that the Code’s terms are “observed rigorously by all editorial staff and external contributors”. The Commission emphasised that this includes agency reporters who supply material to subscribing publications. 

The Commission upheld the complaint under Clause 1 and noted that after issuing its decision it would seek confirmation that the newspaper understood its obligation under the Code to assist the Commission’s inquiries promptly and fully.

 

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network