View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
December 16, 2013

Harry Styles secures High Court harassment order banning paparazzi surveillance

By Darren Boyle

One Direction heart-throb Harry Styles has secured a High Court injunction preventing paparazzi photographers from approaching within 50 metres of his home.

Also the court ordered that the unnamed photographers must not monitor the 19 year-old star’s movements or follow him by car or motorbike.

Judge Nicola Davies also said “Paparazzi AAA and others” must not keep Styles under any form of surveillance.

Styles was represented in court by David Sherborne QC who said four of the photographers were in the process of being identified.

It is understood that Styles’ legal team has written to the DVLA to secure the names and addresses of the photographers involved.

Letters have also been sent to the photographic agencies who use the images.

A spokesman for the teen singer told Press Gazette: “This is not a privacy order. Harry is not trying to prevent fans approaching him in the street and taking photos. He remains happy to do that, as he always has. Rather, it is the method or tactics which have been used by a certain type of photographer.”

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The legal tactic has been used in the past by other celebrities and the Royal Family has issued warnings to newspaper editors against using photographs supplied by paparazzi.

Lawyers for Pippa Middleton warned photographic agencies last year that they may seek an injunction aimed preventing stalkers to curb paparazzi-style excesses.

Also, singer Lily Allen used the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 to stop paparazzi photographers from camping outside her London home.

Celebrities such as Sienna Miller and Cheryl Cole have also secured similar orders.

Media lawyer Mark Stephens told The Times that celebrities were now considering harassment claims because privacy injunctions were difficult to obtain: “This is a copycat of an injunction obtained by Jackie Onassis against the original [paparazzo], Ron Galella.”

Stephens added that while this prevents paparazzi standing outside Styles’ front door, it won’t stop them photographing him “close up” with long lenses.

The injunction will continue until a further court case on the week of 13 January when it will be decided how the action should proceed.

The singer was not in court today.

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network