View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Gillingham FC bid to unmask BBC Online commenters

By Sarah Limbrick

Gillingham Football Club has launched a legal battle with the BBC over a comment left on a blog post on the corporation’s sport website.

The League Two football club wants to sue an individual over allegations of racial hatred within the club, but does not know his identity.

The club has turned to the High Court in London seeking an order that would force the BBC to disclose the name, postal address, and email address of the individual who has made postings under a pseudonym.

According to a writ filed at the High Court, it has had its requests for the BBC to voluntarily hand over the information turned down by the corporation.

In the writ, the club says it has a valid claim for damages against whoever made the posting last December, but first needs to find out who to sue.

Gillingham Football Club’s bid to unmark BBC’s website commenters comes just three weeks after a woman failed in a similar bid to obtain an order forcing Mail Online to disclose the identities of two people who made comments about her on the newspaper website.

Jane Clift applied to the High Court for an order instructing Martin Clarke, publisher of the Mail Online, to provide her with information that would help identify those who had added comments to a report about a successful libel case in which she had brought.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Justice Sharp refused to grant the orders Clift sought as the potential disclosure of information to her engaged the users’ rights to respect for their private and family lives under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The court also had to take into account the privacy policy of Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail Online, it was therefore disproportionate to grant the application and it was appropriate to refuse it, the judgment concluded.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network