Dismiss

Gender pay gap figures 2018: Reuters, ITN, Guardian, BBC and FT publish reduced wage gaps + full list so far

UK media organisations have begun to reveal their gender pay gaps for 2018, one year on since the first legal requirement to publish the statistics.

Reuters has the highest median gender pay gap of the publishers and broadcasters which have already revealed their 2018 figures, at 21.9 per cent favouring men.

Guardian and Observer publisher Guardian News and Media has seen its median gender pay gap – the difference between the middle salaries when put in order for men and women – fall by a third in the past year.

It dropped from 12.1 per cent to 8.4 per cent, but still favours men.When focusing only on the group’s editorial staff, the median pay gap falls to 6.4 per cent, down from 8.8 per cent last year.

Scroll down for full median and mean gender pay gap figures for 2018, which will be updated as and when the information becomes available

The figures were disclosed as part of a Government imperative for companies with 250 or more employees to publish annual figures comparing men and women’s average pay, starting with data for 2017.

Companies, many of whom began taking action in the past year to improve their gender pay gaps, have begun to reveal their second round of figures as of the snapshot date of 5 April 2018.

The BBC revealed in July it had cut its median gender pay gap by almost a fifth in the past year, from 9.3 per cent to 7.6 per cent, following “concerted action” to close the gap fully by 2020.

The Financial Times has also reduced its pay gap, with the median falling slightly from 19.4 per cent last year to 18.4 per cent.

Magazine publisher DC Thomson’s median pay gap has stayed much the same year-on-year, going from 15.7 per cent in 2017 to 15.4 per cent in 2018.

Its mean gap, calculated by adding all salaries together then dividing by the number of salaried staff, remains at 22.9 per cent.

Meanwhile ITN, including Channel 4 News, ITV News and Channel 5 News, has narrowly reduced its median gender pay gap from 18.2 per cent to 18.1 per cent with a bigger drop in its mean gap from 19.6 per cent to 16.7 per cent.

The broadcaster’s median bonus pay gap has dropped from 50 per cent favouring men to 0 per cent.

The UK national average hourly median gender pay gap is 18.4 per cent, according to the Office for National Statistics. The national average mean gap is 17.4 per cent.

Last year Press Gazette reported the mean as the main pay gap measure, but included the median figures as well. This year we are using the median as the main measure, but will look to include the mean gap where reported.

See below for the full media gender pay and bonus pay gap figures ranked from highest to lowest by the 2018 median figure, collated using data submitted on the Government portal and other available gender pay reports.

Positive figures favour men while negative figures favour women.

The median and mean gender pay gap breakdown among news publishers, broadcasters and magazines from 2017 to 2018 (reported so far):

Company Median hourly gender pay gap (%) Mean hourly gender pay gap (%)
2017 2018 2017 2018
Reuters 23.6 21.9 20.2 18.7
Financial Times 19.4 18.4 24.4 22
ITN 18.2 18.1 19.6 16.7
DC Thomson 15.7 15.4 22.9 22.9
Guardian News and Media 12.1 8.4 11.3 11.7
BBC 9.3 7.6 10.7 8.4
The bonus pay gap breakdown among news publishers, broadcasters and magazines from 2017 to 2018 (reported so far):

 

Company Median bonus pay gap (%) Mean bonus pay gap (%)
2017 2018 2017 2018
Reuters 33.1 32.7 40.9 35.3
DC Thomson 43.5 27.1 65.7 61.3
Financial Times 28.3 26.1 37.9 37.4
ITN 50 0 77.2 60
Guardian News and Media -74.8 0 -1.1 34.2
BBC 0 0 20.3 2.5


Picture: Pixabay

Comments

1 thought on “Gender pay gap figures 2018: Reuters, ITN, Guardian, BBC and FT publish reduced wage gaps + full list so far”

  1. My ­b­est ­fr­i­e­n­d’s ­m­ot­h­er-­i­n-­l­Aw ­m­A­k­es $67 ­ev­ery ­h­our ­o­n t­h­e ­l­A­pt­o­p. S­h­e ­h­As ­b­e­e­n ­f­ir­e­d ­fr­o­m w­or­k ­f­or 9 ­m­o­nt­hs ­but ­l­Ast ­m­o­nt­h ­h­er ­p­Ay­m­e­nt w­As $17177 just w­or­k­i­n­g ­o­n t­h­e ­l­A­pt­o­p ­f­or ­A ­f­ew ­h­ours. R­e­A­d ­m­or­e o­n t­h­is w­e­b s­it­e­g­o t­o t­h­is s­it­e AND SEE MORE BY COPY PASTE……………………………www.cashself.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *