View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Businessmen pursuing ‘right to be forgotten’ in High Court after Google refuses to ‘delist’ stories on past convictions

By PA Media Lawyer

Google is pleading a “public interest” defence in a case in which two businessmen are taking action in the High Court in a bid to stop their names being linked to internet media reports about past crimes.

The two men say convictions are more than a decade old and legally “spent”.

Both argue that they have a “right to be forgotten” and want Google to stop linking their names to articles on news websites.

A judge has begun to consider evidence relating to the first man.

Mr Justice Warby, who says the men cannot be named in media reports of the litigation, heard that the first man was convicted of “conspiracy to account falsely” in the late 1990s.

He is overseeing a trial at the High Court in London which is expected to last several days.

The second man’s case is due to be analysed at a further trial in the near future.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Lawyers representing Google say the cases are to first “right to be forgotten claims” aired in an English court.

Barrister Antony White QC, who is leading Google’s legal team, told Mr Justice Warby that Google had “declined to delist” the material.

“The claimants are businessmen who have current business interests which may involve interaction with actual and potential customers and investors and others, and who have posted statements online about their business experience and expertise,” he said.

“The material in question is materially accurate.”

He added: “There are strong public interest reasons for maintaining access to the publications.”

Barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC, who is representing the first businessman, said the information at the centre of the case was “spent” under legislation relating to the rehabilitation of offenders and had become “private”.

“There is a strong public policy in favour of the rehabilitation of criminal offenders,” he said. “The claimant has served his sentence and the rehabilitation period has expired.”

Tomlinson said the man had not been charged with any subsequent offence.

He added: “Google should not, by the application of its own standards of morality, undermine the clear policy of Parliament.”

Picture: Reuters

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network