Boris Johnson resigns: How journalists brought 'careless power' to account

Seven days in July when journalists brought 'careless power' to account

Journalists and Boris Johnson

This week we journalists can all walk a little taller.

There will be a change of political leadership in the UK as a direct result of revelations by the news media.

From Barnard Castle to Chris Pincher via Partygate and Wallpapergate, journalists reporting facts that those in power would rather remained secret have changed the course of history.

Last month at a memorial event for the great former Sunday Times editor Harold Evans the historian Simon Schama warned that we live in a “scoundrel age” and that we need the great editor back to “set out in black and white the unvarnished truth”.

Tina Brown said of her late husband: “He never lost his conviction that goodness would prevail but only if people of will and courage held careless power to account.”

The “unvarnished truth” has certainly been set out over the last week and “careless power” is heading for the exit.

First there was Sun political reporter Noa Hoffman who on 1 July, just a few days into the job, revealed that the Tory deputy chief whip had resigned after groping two men whilst drunk.

On Sunday (3 July), the Mail on Sunday splashed on a report by Glen Owens and Dan Hodges claiming the PM knew about allegations against Chris Pincher two years before appointing him deputy chief whip.

Then a a day later, the BBC’s Ione Wells revealed Johnson had been told about a formal complaint about Pincher’s “inappropriate behaviour” when he was a Foreign Office minister in 2019/20.

None of it is quite at the level of the Thalidomide investigation, but the drip-drip of revelations around lockdown-breaching gatherings at Downing Street and other prime ministerial misbehaviour have cost Johnson his job.

As ever, the way he has dealt with revelations (to obfuscate rather than accept) has caused as much damage as the stories themselves.

It’s heartening that the revelations have come from across the political spectrum, including The Guardian, Mirror, ITV News, Telegraph, BBC, Sun and Mail titles.

We set out a timeline of the scoops that damaged Boris Johnson here. 

It hasn’t been a concerted campaign, nor can it remotely be described as a conspiracy. The editorial leadership of The Sun and Mail titles are clearly strong Boris supporters, but news is news.

The fourth estate has done its job and UK politics will be cleaner in future as a result.

It’s not for editors to decide who becomes prime minister. But if reporting the truth about Johnson has led colleagues (and the country) to decide he is no longer the right person to be in that job we can reflect that journalists have played their part in democracy and done their duty.

Sir Harry may be gone, but the journalistic values he personified live on.

Picture: PA Wire/Gareth Fuller

SIGN UP HERE FOR

FUTURE OF MEDIA

Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.

Author: Dominic Ponsford

Dominic Ponsford is the editor of Press Gazette

Comments

2 thoughts on “Seven days in July when journalists brought 'careless power' to account”

  1. I really hope you feel so proud of yourself.

    The media in this country have made us a laughing stock throughout the world

    The old cliche comes to mind “what goes around comes around” any body can dig up dirt about anyone if they put there mind to it “ staged or not”

    I believe all the press have gone too far, you all think you are gods and can’t be touched…. What have you done for your country? I served for mine

Comments are closed.