BBC upholds complaint against Emily Maitlis over 'sneering' Newsnight discussion with Rod Liddle

The BBC has upheld a complaint that claimed Emily Maitlis was “sneering and bullying” towards columnist Rod Liddle during a live Newsnight discussion.

The BBC’s internal executive complaints unit found that Maitlis was too “persistent and personal” in her criticism of Liddle during the discussion on 15 July, leaving her open to claims she had “failed to be even-handed”.

Liddle, Spectator associate editor and a columnist for the Sun, was part of a discussion about Brexit with Maitlis and Tom Baldwin, director of communications for the People’s Vote campaign.

How serious a threat does the coronavirus outbreak pose to the news industry?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The segment was investigated after a viewer complained about Maitlis’ attitude towards Liddle, which they claimed exemplified the way the BBC views Leave voters.

The complaint was published by Liddle in his Spectator column the day after the interview took place.

During the programme, in which Liddle discussed his book about Brexit called The Great Betrayal, Maitlis said: “You’re not angry that we haven’t left, you say that the Remain argument was that all Leavers were basically racists and xenophobes…”

She asked Liddle if he would describe himself “as a racist because many see you that way”, and later added that his columns contained “consistent casual racism week after week”.

Maitlis added: “All you do is write about suicide bombers blowing themselves up in Tower Hamlets.”

Liddle argued that the particular column being mentioned was “not casual racism”, adding: “Get a grip, Emily.”

He also said: “Do you have to, at every possible juncture, show the BBC’s grotesque bias? Do you have to?”

Former BBC Radio 4 Today presenter John Humphrys claimed in the first extract from his memoirs published this weekend that the BBC “could simply not grasp” how anyone could vote for Brexit and that the crisis “exposed a fundamental flaw in the culture of the BBC”.

He also said there is a “form of institutional liberal bias” within its walls.

In a ruling published on Friday, the BBC’s executive complaints unit said it was valid for Maitlis to press Liddle on his personal views and that he had sufficient opportunity to defend himself.

“However it was insufficiently clear that this was not Ms Maitlis’s view of Mr Liddle but that of his critics, and the persistent and personal nature of the criticism risked leaving her open to the charge that she had failed to be even-handed between the two guests,” the complaints unit went on.

It said the Newsnight team had been “reminded of the need to ensure rigorous questioning of controversial views does not lead to a perceived lack of impartiality”.

The BBC’s executive complaints unit is tasked with considering complaints impartially and independently of the interests of the programme makers/content providers.

Complaints are only sent up to Ofcom if a complainant is unhappy with the BBC’s own handling of the matter.

Picture: BBC

SIGN UP HERE FOR

PRESS GAZETTE DAILY

Our free daily round-up of the biggest news about the world of news

Comments

10 thoughts on “BBC upholds complaint against Emily Maitlis over 'sneering' Newsnight discussion with Rod Liddle”

  1. Sorry to complain… I like Emily Maitlis but she seems to have developed a style of interview that is always infuriated, exasperated and disdainful. She always seems to feel she has to put the interviewee under pressure even when there is nothing worth debating. For example, recently she seemed to be challenging the Huawei representative about how he felt about not being trusted by the British Government. Last night she seemed highly irritated with a panel of Democrats for having a Republican president that was being impeached. It is a technique from which little information or anything interesting emerges and is tiring to listen to. Other Newsnight presenters (and Fiona Bruce on Question Time) also tend to do it except Mark Urban who has a calmer and more relaxed style that allows you to concentrate on the content rather than the interview style.

1 2 3 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nine + 13 =