View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

BBC reporter told editors it was ‘possible’ police felt ‘pressured’ into co-operating over coverage of raid on Cliff Richard’s home, judge hears

By PA Media Lawyer

A BBC reporter came to an “understanding” with a senior detective over a search of Sir Cliff Richard’s home but told his editors it was “possible” police felt “pressured” into co-operating, a court heard today.

Dan Johnson broke the story about the singer’s apartment being raided in August 2014 following an allegation of historical child sexual assault.

Lawyers representing Sir Cliff have suggested that Johnson “strong-armed” South Yorkshire Police into telling him when the search would take place, and that he threatened to reveal information against detectives’ wishes if he did not get co-operation.

But today Johnson told Mr Justice Mann at a High Court trial that that had not happened.

“There was an understanding between us,” he said. “If I kept quiet … they would confirm details of the search.”

Sir Cliff is suing the BBC over coverage of the South Yorkshire Police search of his apartment in Sunningdale, Berkshire, and is seeking damages at the “top end” of the scale.

He believes the coverage, which involved the use of a helicopter, was a “very serious invasion” of his privacy.

Content from our partners
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution

The BBC says its coverage was accurate, in good faith, and was a matter of public interest.

Mr Justice Mann has heard Johnson asked a South Yorkshire Police press officer if Sir Cliff was on the “radar” after getting a tip that the singer was being investigated.

Johnson said he told BBC editors that it was “possible” that the people from South Yorkshire Police whom he met had felt “pressured” to co-operate with him.

He told senior staff that the force’s head of corporate communications, Carrie Goodwin, and Det Supt Matthew Fenwick “may have perceived” that he was ready to run a story about the police probe into Sir Cliff, he said.

He had done so because he did not want the editors to think the pair had given him information they should not have.

He was trying to persuade them to amend a BBC article which suggested that the force wanted to “maximise publicity” for the raid, which Fenwick told the court earlier this week was “untrue”.

Johnson was trying to “de-escalate” a row erupting between the force and the BBC, he told the court, adding: “I was just trying to calm this row that was blazing around me at this stage.”

He was also trying to maintain a “positive relationship” with South Yorkshire Police.

Johnson admitted he did not correct Fenwick’s “mistaken perception” that it seemed the reporter knew as much as the force did about the allegation against Sir Cliff.

“I didn’t want to challenge that assertion, even though it wasn’t accurate,” he said.

He sat in silence and did not appear “surprised” while the detective gave him details of the force’s investigation, he said, adding: “It is a journalistic practice to wait and see what you are told to confirm a story.”

Johnson denied telling fellow BBC reporter Danny Shaw that he got his information from a police source.

The court heard Shaw referred to “another officer” as the source of Johnson’s tip-off about the investigation into Sir Cliff in a note he made of a phone conversation between the two journalists.

But Johnson said his colleague had “made an assumption” and that he had not stated his information came from police.

He said: “I kept this as vague as possible because I was as uncomfortable having the discussion then as I am now. But I told him it was a credible source.

“I didn’t tell him that it was definitely someone in a police force.”

He also denied that his confidential source was someone working on Operation Yewtree.

He said he did not know the information had originated from within Yewtree until preparing his witness statement for this trial.

Johnson yesterday told the court he believed the story about the search of Sir Cliff’s home was in the public interest and that he thought his belief was “reasonable”.

Earlier this week, Fenwick told the court he did not want Johnson to run a story about Sir Cliff at the time of their meeting because it could “compromise the investigation”.

They came to an “arrangement” with the police agreeing to notify Johnson when they were ready to take further action.

Fenwick said: “It did not seem as though it would be possible to stop Dan Johnson from reporting the story altogether but I was very concerned that if he reported it now, as he said he was ready to, then the investigation would be prejudiced.

“In particular, publishing a story could cause problems with a search warrant which we were not ready to do yet.

“At the back of my mind I was thinking that it would not only compromise the investigation but could also compromise Sir Cliff Richard by exposing him to allegations, potentially giving him the opportunity to dispose of evidence.”

It was revealed in the course of the trial last week that South Yorkshire Police has agreed to pay Sir Cliff £400,000 and pick up some of his legal fees. The force wants the BBC to contribute to this sum.

Picture: Kirsty O’Connor/PA Wire

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network