BBC boss: We had 'responsibility' to report Sir Cliff Richard allegations against backdrop of Savile failures

The BBC did “the right thing” by revealing that detectives were investigating Sir Cliff Richard and searching his home following a child sex assault allegation, an editor has told a High Court judge.

Gary Smith told Mr Justice Mann that journalists had a responsibility to report such stories.

He said public interest reporting often involved revealing things a famous name would prefer the public did not hear.

Smith, who was UK news editor for BBC News at the time of the search and is now the corporation’s head of news and current affairs in Scotland, outlined his thoughts on Monday during the latest stage of a High Court trial in London.

Sir Cliff, 77, has sued the BBC over coverage of the South Yorkshire Police search in August 2014 and wants damages at the “top end” of the scale.

He says the coverage, which involved the use of a helicopter, was a “very serious invasion” of his privacy.

The BBC disputes his claims. Bosses say coverage of the search of the apartment in Sunningdale, Berkshire, was accurate and in good faith.

“The BBC was confident we knew who the individual under investigation was,” Smith told the judge.

“From an editorial point of view, those making the decision (myself included) were satisfied as to the accuracy of the BBC’s intelligence and that it was the right thing to do to name Sir Cliff Richard in our reporting – that is to say that it was in the public interest for the BBC as a media organisation to inform the public of the investigation.

“It was our responsibility as journalists to report upon such stories because of the considerable debate going on about whether there had been failings by the authorities in allowing certain public figures to have access to young people and what the authorities and indeed media organisations (including the BBC) knew about certain individuals.

“South Yorkshire Police’s investigation into Sir Cliff Richard was part of a sequence of ongoing significant public interest stories about police investigations into public figures for sexual abuse.”

Smith said the BBC had reported investigations into a number of high-profile figures, including entertainer Rolf Harris, publicist Max Clifford, presenter Paul Gambaccini and comedian Jimmy Tarbuck.

He said those reports had not attracted legal complaints over breach of privacy.

Tarbuck and Gambaccini had been investigated and arrested but not charged, he said, while Harris and Clifford were convicted of sexual offences.

“Sir Cliff Richard would have been the biggest household name to be under investigation,” he said.

“I say this in the sense that he was and is a high-profile public figure whose public status went beyond his success as an entertainer.

“He was known for his charitable work and was ‘part of the establishment’ in many ways.”

Smith said editors had to consider whether it was right to withhold information the BBC had.

“These discussions took place against the backdrop of (the) history of the Jimmy Savile allegations and knowledge within institutions which had not been made public,” he said.

“An important factor in the editorial discussions about naming individuals who were the subject of police investigations was the issue of the media not reporting information it knew to be correct.”

He added: “The BBC could have been accused of not reporting a matter of high public interest because Sir Cliff Richard was a high-profile public figure.”

Smith said: “This was not a matter where we would have sought Sir Cliff‘s consent to run the story. It is obvious he would not have consented.”

Picture: Kirsty O’Connor/PA Wire

Comments

7 thoughts on “BBC boss: We had 'responsibility' to report Sir Cliff Richard allegations against backdrop of Savile failures”

  1. The BBC is institutionally corrupt, no-one should have the right to drag an innocent person (Sir Cliff Richard) through Hell. The BBC have destroyed in minutes a reputation that has taken 6 decades to build. Can the BBC now restore Sir Cliff’s reputation to the position of was before they televised the raid – I don’t think so! The reporter who strong-armed the Police (although he denies it – his e-mails suggest otherwise) is lying in court, his bosses new that the information was from a dubious source and are attempting to justify it. It is clear the BBC colluded with the Police and this is appalling. I for one, feel sick of the BBC’s misuse of my licence fee, using it to hire a helicopter as if Sir Cliff was a mass murderer. I hope the BBC get taken for millions – it is an out of touch and corrupt organisation which should be shut down.

  2. Reply to Blogger Jane – although you may believe that Sir Cliff is taking the BBC to court for financial reasons, he is one of the few artists that give a regular portion of his income to charity. He is renowned for his charitable work, unlike BBC directors who also earn a lot and misuse our licence fee by hiring helicopters.

1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *