View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Business
March 25, 2009

ASA bans ‘misleading’ Dewsbury Press readership claim

By Paul McNally

An advertisement for the Dewsbury Press in Yorkshire claiming it had more readers than its rivals has been banned by the advertising watchdog.

The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that the front-page flash breached the truthfulness clause of the advertising code of practice and made unfair comparisons.

The ad read: “Dewsbury & Mirfield Reporter: 11,554 copies and falling. Batley & Birstall News: 8,292 copies and falling. The Press: 33,000 homes a week! The paper that’s the best read in Kirklees.”

The Johnston Press-owned Yorkshire Weekly Newspaper Group, which publishes the Reporter and the News, complained that the claim was misleading and said the source for the figures should have been mentioned.

The Press said the figures quoted for the Reporter and the News were officially audited ABC results.

It provided a letter from its distributors stating it handed out 30,000 free copies of The Press, and said more free copies were distributed on top of that.

The ASA ruled that it was wrong to compare the audited circulation of two paid-for newspapers with unaudited figures for a free title.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

“Because The Press was distributed mainly as a free paper and the other two papers in the comparison were paid-for titles, the comparison was presented in the ad in such a way that it was likely to mislead,” it said.

The watchdog also said that describing the Reporter’s circulation as falling was inaccurate and misleading, because the title had posted a slight increase in circulation compared with the previous ABC auditing period.

On the claim to be the “best-read” paper in Kirklees, the ASA added: “We considered that, because we had not seen evidence to support it, the comparative claim was likely to mislead. We told The Press to ensure future comparative claims were both clear and fair.”

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network