View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
February 17, 2009

Google to US newspapers: We could acquire you, but what’s the point?

By Peter Kirwan MM blog

A couple of weeks ago, Fortune carried a surreal conversation between editor-at-large Adam Lashinsky and Eric Schmidt, chief executive of Google.

The subject was the future of the newspaper industry.

Schmidt started out –- as he has done a few times in the past — by suggesting that there’s plenty of demand for news. (‘People love the news.”) But there are terrible difficulties, too: ‘a problem with advertising, classifieds and the cost itself of a newspaper: physical printing, delivery and so on.”

As a result, he says, the business model ‘gets squeezed”.

This much we know. But Lashinsky’s follow-up question is a corker. No doubt with Timothy Geitner in mind, he asks Schmidt this:

How about just buying them?

Without apparently batting an eyelid, Schmidt replies that Google has the cash to do so. But, he adds:

Content from our partners
Pugpig named best media technology partner of 2024 by AOP
Cannes Lions: The world's best creativity all in one place
L'Equipe signs content syndication deal with The Content Exchange

I don’t think our purchasing a newspaper would solve the business problems. It would help solidify the ownership structure, but it doesn’t solve the underlying problem in the business. Until we can answer that question we’re in this uncomfortable conversation.

I think the solution is tighter integration. In other words, we can do this without making an acquisition. The term I’ve been using is ‘merge without merging.’ The Web allows you to do that, where you can get the Web systems of both organizations fairly well integrated, and you don’t have to do it on exclusive basis.

‘Merging without merging”? What precisely does Schmidt mean by this? Quite aside from the idea of outsourcing all sales activity to Google, it’s not clear than he knows entirely, because before long, he’s telling Lashinsky this:

The fundamental question you’re asking is why does Google not write large checks to newspapers? We’re careful at Google with our money. We write large checks when we have a great strategy. And we don’t yet have that strategy.

Insiders will smile wryly at the mention of Google’s new-found financial prudence. All the same, it’s interesting to dwell on the possibilities. If Eric Schmidt doesn’t yet possess a workable plan, he may do so at some point in the future.

Descending rapidly from the this 20,000 ft perspective. . . it’s also clear that Schmidt’s colleague Tim Armstrong is getting stuck into the news industry’s crisis at ground level.

Armstrong, who runs Google’s global sales operation, has been revealed as an investor in Patch, a New York-based start-up that aims to spawn a new generation of local news sites across America. Or as Patch’s site puts it:

We’re a community-specific news and information platform dedicated to providing comprehensive and trusted local coverage for individual towns and communities.

Patch launched itself upon the world last week.  At the moment, it runs sites for just three of those ‘individual towns and communities”: Millburn, Maplewood and South Orange, all of which are in New Jersey.

Valleywag has a typically sour take on Armstrong’s venture. The site suggests that local journalism is a ‘starter job that desperate grads take straight out of J-school”.

The site adds: ‘The difference, in this Google-funded scenario, is that there won’t be anywhere else to go from there.”

Well, we’ll see. I’m inclined to give a bit more credence to Armstrong and his effort. Credit to him, at the very least, for putting his money where Eric Schmidt’s mouth is.

As Johsua Mack points out, Patch looks a little bit like backfence.

Uh-huh: and here’s Jeff Jarvis popping up on the Patch Editorial Advisory Board.

Which leads us to an apposite question: what would Google do?

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network