View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
May 28, 2008

Google monopoly: Techcrunch founder backs Microsoft as saviour

By Peter Kirwan MM blog

If we’re seeing the beginnings of a proper debate about Google’s dominance (monopoly?) in the UK, something similar seems to be happening in the US.

There, Michael Arrington, the Web 2.0 guru who runs TechCrunch, spent part of his Sunday penning a lengthy article entitled “The Importance Of A Competitive Search Market”.

In some respects, Arrington is arguing ahead of the pack. He claims, for example, that Google’s dominance of search means that “little effort is put into innovation”. Specifically, he offers up one example of what he believes is going wrong:

For example, the CPC (cost per click) model is flawed, but in Google’s favor because it puts fraud risk inefficiently on the advertisers, who have no way of controlling it at the search engine level. CPA (cost per action) models work much better, but Google has done little more than test them. The current system is great for Google and bad for advertisers. But advertisers have nowhere else to go. . .

And another: the fact that Google “doesn’t share enough revenue with content sites that show their ads”.

The only thing keeping them even close to honest is the fact that Yahoo and Microsoft will occasionally compete for those partners. Take that away, and Google will go back to keeping the majority of advertising revenue generated at those sites. . . That is a terrible outcome when you look at it from the perspective of the health of the Internet.

As a good Silicon Valley boy, Arrington wants everyone to get behind Microsoft and help it to provide Google with some real competition.

Content from our partners
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution
Papermule: Workflow automation for publishers

The thought of Microsoft as a liberator of media and advertisers is novel. Given the lack of success the company has met with in search markets thus far, it’s also an unlikely one.

Arrington acknowledges as much when he writes: “There’s a reason monopolies get broken up by governments. Market forces can’t generally undo them.”

Topics in this article : , , ,

Email to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network