Who says millennials don't read newspapers? Editor Ted Young on the rise and rise of Metro - Press Gazette

Who says millennials don't read newspapers? Editor Ted Young on the rise and rise of Metro

While many still talk about the inevitable death of newspapers – the enduring success of one title proves that readers, and even millennials, still love print.

Launched in 1999, Metro is now the most read newspaper in the UK in terms of monthly reach (according to the National Readership Survey) with 10.4m readers a month in 2016.

While paid-for national newspapers are in near universal decline, Metro continues to raise its free distribution – up 9.5 per cent year on year to 1.5m copies per day in February.

It looks to be only a matter of months before it overtakes The Sun (currently on 1.6m) to become the UK national newspaper with the highest daily print run.

Published by Daily Mail owner DMGT, Metro is distributed on weekdays via pick-up points at major train, bus, Tube and tram stations in major cities around the UK.

Metro editor since 2014, Ted Young has his own theory about this print title’s ongoing success.

“Obviously it’s free and my kids, who are in their mid twenties, would never consider buying their news.

“I think we are tapping into that market of people who are very interested in the news, very engaged in the news – we know from our tablet edition that they are very engaged with the politics and serious stuff that we do, but they are not prepared to pay…

“I’m a commuter and I think if you go on a tube or train you will see Metro being read more than any other newspaper on a morning.

“My theory is that a lot of people now spend eight or nine hours a day sitting in front of a screen, there is something about print and the newspaper which is giving them a screen break.

“No need to scroll, no need to download, I don’t think there is anything more mobile than a newspaper.

“You can sit on it and it won’t break. Paper is an incredibly versatile product, if you use it like we are doing as a short snappy read.”

The digital edition, a facsimile of the print title designed to be read on tablets, has an average daily readership of just over 30,000 and provides Young with daily feedback on exactly which articles are being read and for how long.

The average time spent with the digital edition is 27 minutes. Young estimates that print readers average 20 minutes, a level of engagement which is unheard of for news websites.

He says: “We essentially are a news aggregator, we are never going to win a Pulitzer prize. We don’t break great exclusives.

“What we do do is provide the working man and woman with all the basic information they need so that when they are at work at the water cooler they can have a chat about what is going on in politics, the world and showbiz. That is my mantra.

“The other mantra I do have is we try to be a paper that we would like people to think they would buy.”

But can Metro survive the current severe pressure on print advertising?

Last year DMGT reported that profit at the title dropped by £1m to £15m on turnover down £5m to £65m.

“Obviously its tough times for everybody, but we are increasing our market share. That says something.”

He adds: “One of the misconceptions about Metro is that because it’s free, people just pick it up.

“It’s not easy to get people to pick up a newspaper. We are putting out nearly 1.5m copies a day…Our returns are about t 1.3 per cent nationally, the number left in the racks, it’s a phenomenal achievement.

“I was at Heathrow airport a couple of Saturdays back and there were huge stacks of the Financial Times which cost £3.50 that nobody wanted to pick up. That rather proves that just putting a newspaper out for people to pick up doesn’t mean they will pick it up.

“The same goes for bulks that other newspapers claim to be paid for, not everybody picks them up. You’ve got to have a product that the commuter is actually going to want to read on the way to work.”

Young is a former editor of short-lived free London title London Lite and Mail Online and has also worked as a senior journalist on The Sun and Express titles.

In September 2004 he was executive editor of the Daily Express on the day of the Beslan School siege in North Ossetia, where at least 385 people would die. Proprietor Richard Desmond jabbed Young in the stomach because an obituary of 1960s pop singer Carl Wayne, from The Move, had appeared in the Daily Mail but not the Daily Express that day.

Young can’t talk about the episode, except to stay that three friends supported him while he was out of work so that he could sue Desmond and secure a reported six-figure payout.

Metro has a total editorial staff of around 60, tiny by national newspaper standards. And while it can’t compete on scoops, it does give the other tabloids a run for their money in terms of eye-catching front pages.

Young says: “I was night editor at The Sun and I always feel a challenge to see if I can come up with a smarter headline than Will Hagerty and his friends over there.”

One example he cites of this is the front page from the Monday after the 23 June Brexit vote for the UK to leave the EU when the country felt rudderless, a picture of Parliament with the headline: “The lights are on but nobody’s home.”

There was also the front from 1 July, when Michael Gove knifed Boris Johnson and Theresa May emerged as Tory leadership frontrunner: “The real game of thrones.”

More recently there was: “Hammond Egg on his face”, the day after the Chancellor’s u-turn on a tax rise for the self-employed.

And this week, after the terror attack on Westminster, the Metro’s poster-style “Terror at the heart of power” front page was among the most powerful of the day.

Young also notes that Metro was the only tabloid to carry the evacuation at the end of the siege of Aleppo on its front page.

He says: “Although news has been on television and websites, we are very much the anchor – we are a place to come to where the readers can say ‘right, ok there’s a lot of white noise going on here, what’s actually happened’.”

Along with the i, Metro is the only UK national newspaper to take a neutral political stance.

In the run-up to the EU referendum, Young says the Leave campaign wanted to take out a cover-wrap advert (worth £250,000). He says he said the only way the paper could do it was if Remain took out an advert as well. As it turned out, they did, meaning Metro made £500,000.

He says that after each the paper received around 300 texts and emails of complaint from readers.

“We don’t want to upset our readers. The reason we are even handed is because we are a very broad church, I think we are a one-nation newspaper. When you are buying the Daily Mail or Daily Mirror you making a conscious decision to buy that product because you believe in what that newspaper’s stance is.

“Metro people are in a hurry, running for the train and they don’t want us to ram political views own their throat.”

Metro research suggests the average age of its readers is 37 (which is said to be 22 years younger than the average weekday newspaper reader overall). Some 1.4m are said to be aged 18 to 24.

Given the rate of decline in the paid-for press, could there become a time when free titles like Metro are the only show in town?

“I think there will always be an audience for paid-for quality papers. For top writing. The Daily Mail seems to be in very robust health and I think quality paid-fors will be here, people will still pay a premium for that.”



Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.

Author: Dominic Ponsford

Dominic Ponsford is the editor of Press Gazette


5 thoughts on “Who says millennials don't read newspapers? Editor Ted Young on the rise and rise of Metro”

  1. “I’m a commuter and I think if you go on a tube or train you will see Metro being read more than any other newspaper on a morning”

    Understandable when you flood the tube and train networks with some to look at that is free. It doesn’t mean people actually want to read it. They just have nothing better to do.

  2. Metro gets read by default because it is free to the reader but its real price is the jobs being cut at paid-for papers.

    I am a sports reporter and have never once heard a Metro writer ask a single question at a press conference.

    The sports coverage is half-hearted, late night cup ties go to print for the next day with no result.

    Yet people pick it up at a station and consider it their daily read. Not because it is any good but because it is free.

    Full of news wire stuff from the previous day.

1 2 3

Comments are closed.