View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Secret inquest plans resurface

By PA Media Lawyer

Plans for secret inquests, which Justice Secretary Jack Straw had said were being dropped, are to be pushed through the House of Commons, it has emerged.

The latest scheme, contained in the Coroners and Justice Bill, would give the Lord Chancellor the absolute discretion to order a secret inquiry rather than a public inquest.

Relatives of the deceased could even be banned from such a hearing – according to the new proposals.

The Government argues that secrecy is needed in a small number of cases to protect national security and aid the fight against crime but critics say it could be a way for the authorities to avoid proper scrutiny of their behaviour and decisions.

The measure was defeated when it was considered in the House of Lords on October 21, but the Government said it would be reintroduced when the Bill returns to the Commons.

Civil rights groups and the National Union of Journalists have expressed concerns about the secrecy plans.

Human rights group Liberty said the powers would stop bereaved families from finding out the truth about how a loved one died.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Jeremy Dear, NUJ general secretary, said: “All inquests should continue to be open to the press and public.

“It is only by that level of public scrutiny that people can be assured there has been a proper investigation into the deaths of their loved-ones.

“This idea is an attack on the basic principle of open justice and open scrutiny of state institutions. The NUJ will be working with MPs and others to oppose this authoritarian measure.”

A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said the scheme would be reintroduced in the Commons as it was important an inquiry into any death should be able to hear all the evidence, even if it meant that part of the hearing should be closed to the public.

She said: “It is also important that evidence is not allowed to harm police operations or the national interest…

“Liberty’s complaints are really about the terms of the Inquiries Act, which has been on the statute book since 2005.

“We have tabled some minor amendments in this Bill to give better effect to the policy, but those amendments do not lead to the lack of transparency and accountability that Liberty sets out.”

Critics say the secrecy power could be used in the cases of deaths such as that of Jean Charles de Menezes, who was shot by police who mistook him for a suspected terrorist, or in cases in which soldiers might have died as a result of equipment shortages.

It is thought the new power might be used to ensure a secret inquiry in the case of 24-year-old Azelle Rodney, who was shot dead by police in 2005 as he sat in a car with two other men.

Rodney’s family has been told that an inquest into his death cannot go ahead because evidence involving sensitive information about police operations cannot be put to the jury.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network