View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. Magazines
September 1, 2008

Reader’s Digest rapped by advertising watchdog for misleading marketing

By Dominic Ponsford

Monthly magazine Reader’s Digest has been rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority for a marketing letter which it said could confuse elderly people.

The direct mail letter was headed: “***PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE*** ENCLOSED FOR THE EYES OF XXXX ONLY.”

It said inside: “Please don’t tell anyone you received this letter from me – at least not yet. I’m breaking with standard procedure and bringing news that is in your favour.

‘It’s a good idea to keep these documents private as only you can benefit from their contents. Many people (including residents of xxxx and even neighbours of yours on xxxx) have previously expressed interest in our Grand Prize Draw.

‘If they, or anyone else, read the documents I’ve enclosed today, they might become jealous as you, xxxx, are one of a specially selected group who have been automatically advanced directly to the £250,000 Winner Selection Stage.”

Reader’s Digest has been running prize draws in the UK for 30 years and said that this mailing was sent to ‘existing loyal customers’who would be ‘familiar with their mailings and the way their draws operated”.

The ASA said that the letter could confuse recipients, particularly elderly ones.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

It said: ‘We understood Trading Standards advised consumers to discuss unsolicited letters with friends and relatives before entering into any kind of prize draw activity. We considered that by directly telling consumers to keep the mailing private and not to discuss it with anyone the mailing was irresponsible and in breach of the Code.”

The ASA also said that they believed the letter exaggerated the recipient’s chances of winning the draw and was therefore ‘likely to mislead”.

The Reader’s Digest was told not to use this mailing again.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network