View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. Digital Journalism
January 31, 2012updated 14 Sep 2012 4:35pm

Parliament told Twitter could now observe gagging orders

By William Turvill

Gagging injunctions aimed at journalists could also be observed by Twitter, the website has told Parliament.

Numerous injunctions observed by journalists have been widely flouted on Twitter over the last year – including one aimed at protecting the privacy of footballer Ryan Giggs.

Last week, Twitter revealed a new policy which enables it to "withhold specific content when required to do so in response to what we believe to be a valid and applicable legal request".

Colin Crowell, head of global public policy for Twitter, yesterday told the joint Parliamentary committee on privacy and injunctions that, if provided with the same information as the media, Twitter could block content which breaches injunctions.

MP Ben Bradshaw cited the Ryan Giggs injunction – which was reportedly broken by 75,000 Twitter users last May.

Crowell said: "[If] we receive, from an authorised entity, a request to take [Tweets] down, then, consistent with applicable law and in terms of service, we will work through those on a case-by-case basis.

"Our policy is now that we have the ability to cater things to a particular jurisdiction."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The committee also challenged Facebook director of policy in Europe Lord Allan of Hallam over the publication of prejudicial material relating to Amanda Knox during her appeal against a murder conviction – which culminated with her release in October.

Lord Allan said: "I think it's important to distinguish a regulator that regulates publications that are editorialised and have this huge influence over the public debate because they reach millions of people and the potential regulation of millions of citizens.

"When you're talking about regulating us, you're talking about regulating the people who post because none of that content is ours.

"I would say it's very much more equivalent to talking about how you might regulate people having a chat in the pub then it is about newspaper regulation."

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network