Morning Star calls Yorkshire Post a 'hypocrite newspaper' in front page attack - Press Gazette

Morning Star calls Yorkshire Post a 'hypocrite newspaper' in front page attack

The Morning Star used its front page today to attack the Yorkshire Post as a “hypocrite newspaper” for reporting a Labour MP’s comments on anti-Semitism while continuing to publish a “race row” ex-Tory MP’s columns.

The Post was first to reveal this week that Chris Williamson MP had told a Momentum meeting in Sheffield that Labour had been “too apologetic” over the anti-Semitism allegations that continue to plague the party.

The Morning Star headline read: “Hypocrite newspaper ran race row Tory’s columns”. The strapline read: “Media double standards.”

Former MP Patrick Mercer writes regularly for the Post, despite having admitted to once telling a teenage soldier that she looked like “a bloody Jew”. He said it had been a “stupid thing to say”.

Mercer resigned as MP for Newark in 2014 amid reports he offered to ask questions in the House of Commons in exchange for cash, in contravention of parliamentary standards.

The Star’s Phil Miller wrote: “The newspaper that ‘exposed’ Chris Williamson MP for stating that Labour had been “too apologetic” over anti-Semitism allegations published a column just days earlier written by a disgraced Tory politician who once called an Israeli soldier a ‘bloody jew’.”

He said the Post had published more than a dozen columns by Mercer in the last 12 months.

Post editor James Mitchinson shared the Star’s front page on Twitter, alongside his response to it.

“Sorry: I’d like to apologise for being a hypocrite,” he said. “As the editor of a trusted newspaper, I should know better than to support one of my journalists in exposing racist hatred.

“My double standards have resulted in sunlight pouring on darkness. I’m sorry, darkness. Dawn is upon us.”

JPI Media, which owns the Post, declined to comment.

Derby North MP Williamson has been suspended by the Labour Party over his comments, pending an investigation.

He told the BBC: “Obviously if I’ve upset anybody it’s the last thing I wanted to do. Maybe I could have chosen my words a bit differently. And if people have been offended by that obviously I want to apologise for that.”

He added: “I am absolutely determined to clear my name about these complaints made about me.”



Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.


4 thoughts on “Morning Star calls Yorkshire Post a 'hypocrite newspaper' in front page attack”

  1. That is not what hypocrisy means. The newspaper, as any free-thinking balanced publication would, merely gave a platform to both schools of thought while itself remaining neutral, albeit with an angle implicitly opposing anti-Semitism and, in the editor’s subsequent tweet, explicitly doing so.

    Just because it carries a “race[-]row Tory’s columns”, it doesn’t necessarily mean the paper endorses, or indeed opposes, his views or behaviour. To be hypocritical would entail actively advocating or passively condoning both sides – which could also be construable as even-handed, open-minded or neutral/disinterested.

    Banning or restricting a contributor on ideological grounds, rather than enabling open debate, would be retrogressively censorious.

  2. No surprise that Reach playing cheapskates again. Should be their company motto. Sending one reporter to cover up to four titles in one go from one match.
    Conning the readers.

1 2

Comments are closed.