Local journalists in Plymouth decide not to picture gunman - Press Gazette

'This is more than a news story for us': Why local journalists in Plymouth won't doorknock or show gunman's face

Plymouth shooting gunman

Local journalists in Plymouth have decided not to picture the gunman who killed five people in a rampage that shocked the UK last week, and said they won’t be contacting impacted residents straight away.

Journalists for Reach’s Plymouth Live website and newspapers, including the Plymouth Herald, told residents of Keyham that they would not be knocking on their doors after police cordons lifted on Sunday.

Despite images of shooter Jake Davison appearing in national media, Plymouth Live is instead centring its coverage on his five victims: his mother Maxine, 51, Lee Martyn, 43, and his three-year-old daughter Sophie, Stephen Washington, 59, and Kate Shepherd, 66.

Digital editor Edd Moore told Press Gazette: “Without trying to get too emotional about it – this is more than a news story for us.

“We’re local people who live in and around the city and I’ve never known an incident that has had quite such a profound devastating impact on the city and quite frankly it’s just one of those where the residents deserve the space to grieve in our opinion.

“We’re journalists, of course, but on a local level we’re motivated by wanting to do the best by the city when all is said and done. With something quite as sensitive and as major as this, nothing matters more than that to us.”

The incident hit the Plymouth Live team particularly hard as one of their journalists, engagement producer Jess Morcom, was the cousin of victim Lee Martyn.

Moore said this was “a really tragic reminder that we’re custodians of the city but we’re all linked – this is our friends, our neighbours, our relatives that we’re reporting on day to day”.

“We know that and we take that approach with every story we cover, but particularly with something this sensitive it’s when it matters the most and when we feel more than ever that we’ve got a responsibility to the people that are most affected by it.”

He added of the decision not to doorknock: “We all know people who are affected by this. So as far as decision making goes it didn’t even feel like a decision to us – it’s just about doing the right thing.”

As Plymouth Live crime reporter Carl Eve told residents: “You need time and space to process this. If you want to speak to us later, we’ll be here to listen to you.”

Plymouth shooting gunman
Plymouth Herald front page on Monday 16 August 2021

Some local journalists have been critical of national media’s arrival in the area to cover the story.

Morcom tweeted: “…as someone who works in the industry myself, a large number of national ‘journalists’ need to be retrained with how to handle intrusion into grief. Turning up at family homes trying to hound is unforgivable. Appreciate the sensitivity shown by local colleagues.”

Aaron James, a Reach journalist for sister title Cornwall Live, added he had “equally never been more appalled to be a journalist when I’ve seen how national media have behaved but at the same time never more proud to be a local journalist”.

Moore declined to comment on any specific criticism, but told Press Gazette: “I can only influence what my team does. The local journalists are the ones that are there next week, next month, next year.

“We will be seeing the long term impact of what’s happened and actually living it with everyone else in the city… I can only say that our motivation is in standing shoulder to shoulder with the people of Plymouth.

“We are journalists and we understand how these things work, but we’ve got a unique role to play in our community, I think, as local reporters.”

Moore said the decision not to picture Davison was expected to last at least several more days. The 22-year-old was named, however, to make sure the incident could be fully and accurately reported.

On Thursday night as police responded to the shooting, there was a “vacuum of information” of about three-and-a-half hours as journalists waited for information about what had happened from emergency services.

In the meantime social media was awash with footage from the scene and unverified information. Plymouth Live decided not to use any of it and instead wait for the facts. Moore described that night as “incredibly hard”.

“It was evident from the outset that this was a major, major incident, and one that we just had to stick simply to the known facts on,” he said.

“So again, it felt like an easy decision at the time, it wasn’t even a decision it was just the way it was naturally handled. It was immensely difficult because of course we were seeing all those pictures and videos from the scene, we were seeing all the same social media posts that other members of the public were seeing with eyewitness reports and speculation, but we just felt that at a time when panic and fear was obviously very high amongst everyone in the city we had a duty to just report what was known.

“It would have been helpful if the emergency services were able to provide more timely details but obviously we’re dealing with a critical incident and we can totally understand that their resources were rightly focused on dealing with the matter in hand.”

The coverage has garnered some “extraordinary” audience figures for Plymouth Live, but Moore said this was “encouraging not because it’s a high number, but because people are trusting us to tell them the information about what’s going on”.

Asked what lessons he has learned so far from coverage of the incident, Moore said: “Our readers appreciate the fact that we’ve been as sensitive as we possibly can be in our reporting of this. It’s just reinforced to me how important it is to listen to your readers and… consider what you would want to read if you were affected yourself.”

Plymouth Live has also started a fundraiser with a local charity to support the families, friends and communities affected by the shooting. More than £20,000 was raised in the first two days.

Picture: PA Wire/Ben Birchall



Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.


9 thoughts on “'This is more than a news story for us': Why local journalists in Plymouth won't doorknock or show gunman's face”

  1. I’ve witnessed national and agency reporters’ antics in sensitive cases before and therefore have sympathy with some of what is being said here. I recall attending a court case in which one teenager had killed another and an agency reporter covering it for a national tabloid was relentless in pressuring the killer’s grandmother to give him the phone number of the killer’s mother.

    The mother had not attended court because she was too distraught. The grandmother explained this and refused to give out the number over and over again, but he just kept arguing and pleading with her. This was happening very loudly in the court waiting area during the lunch break. He obviously knew he was going to get a bollocking if he didn’t deliver it, but it was embarrassing and uncomfortable and, without question, a flagrant ethical breach. Whoever was managing him was ultimately responsible and had clearly heaped pressure on him to get an interview with the mother.

    The door-knocking thing I get, although it’s dependent on the situation. If a family has had ten national and agency hacks bang on their door already, behaving in a desperate and not particularly sympathetic way, then sending a local reporter is only going to aggravate them further, regardless of how professional they are. But if you can get there first (which a local should be able to do with ease), or are working on a story the nationals have deemed insufficiently important to cover, it is remiss not to go and knock.

    As for not showing the killer’s face, that just seems like virtue-signalling nonsense. Part of the job of a responsible local press at this time would be to mount a major investigation into this guy – his online activities, his reputation in the community, his ex-girlfriends, etc – and find out how many people knew he was a danger, who was asked to do something about it, when they were asked, and why they didn’t do it.

    The killer has to be at the centre of the coverage, because it is only he who can lead you to uncover the institutional failures. There are namby-pamby whingers who will clutch their pearls and shriek that reporting on the killer somehow glorifies him or might encourage others to copy him, but we all know that’s complete nonsense and we cannot, as an industry, pander to those sort of histrionics. The number one job in this story is to find out who this guy was, who could and should have stopped him doing what he did, and why they failed to do so.

  2. I watched national press come into my village last year door knocking, interviewing people with a limited knowledge of the situation and making simple errors in reporting. The only person who wrote a factually accurate story was the apprentice from a regional paper. Completely understand the stance of the Plymouth Herald.

1 2 3 4 5

Comments are closed.