Local journalists in Plymouth decide not to picture gunman - Press Gazette

'This is more than a news story for us': Why local journalists in Plymouth won't doorknock or show gunman's face

Plymouth shooting gunman

Local journalists in Plymouth have decided not to picture the gunman who killed five people in a rampage that shocked the UK last week, and said they won’t be contacting impacted residents straight away.

Journalists for Reach’s Plymouth Live website and newspapers, including the Plymouth Herald, told residents of Keyham that they would not be knocking on their doors after police cordons lifted on Sunday.

Despite images of shooter Jake Davison appearing in national media, Plymouth Live is instead centring its coverage on his five victims: his mother Maxine, 51, Lee Martyn, 43, and his three-year-old daughter Sophie, Stephen Washington, 59, and Kate Shepherd, 66.

Digital editor Edd Moore told Press Gazette: “Without trying to get too emotional about it – this is more than a news story for us.

“We’re local people who live in and around the city and I’ve never known an incident that has had quite such a profound devastating impact on the city and quite frankly it’s just one of those where the residents deserve the space to grieve in our opinion.

“We’re journalists, of course, but on a local level we’re motivated by wanting to do the best by the city when all is said and done. With something quite as sensitive and as major as this, nothing matters more than that to us.”

The incident hit the Plymouth Live team particularly hard as one of their journalists, engagement producer Jess Morcom, was the cousin of victim Lee Martyn.

Moore said this was “a really tragic reminder that we’re custodians of the city but we’re all linked – this is our friends, our neighbours, our relatives that we’re reporting on day to day”.

“We know that and we take that approach with every story we cover, but particularly with something this sensitive it’s when it matters the most and when we feel more than ever that we’ve got a responsibility to the people that are most affected by it.”

He added of the decision not to doorknock: “We all know people who are affected by this. So as far as decision making goes it didn’t even feel like a decision to us – it’s just about doing the right thing.”

As Plymouth Live crime reporter Carl Eve told residents: “You need time and space to process this. If you want to speak to us later, we’ll be here to listen to you.”

Plymouth shooting gunman
Plymouth Herald front page on Monday 16 August 2021

Some local journalists have been critical of national media’s arrival in the area to cover the story.

Morcom tweeted: “…as someone who works in the industry myself, a large number of national ‘journalists’ need to be retrained with how to handle intrusion into grief. Turning up at family homes trying to hound is unforgivable. Appreciate the sensitivity shown by local colleagues.”

Aaron James, a Reach journalist for sister title Cornwall Live, added he had “equally never been more appalled to be a journalist when I’ve seen how national media have behaved but at the same time never more proud to be a local journalist”.

Moore declined to comment on any specific criticism, but told Press Gazette: “I can only influence what my team does. The local journalists are the ones that are there next week, next month, next year.

“We will be seeing the long term impact of what’s happened and actually living it with everyone else in the city… I can only say that our motivation is in standing shoulder to shoulder with the people of Plymouth.

“We are journalists and we understand how these things work, but we’ve got a unique role to play in our community, I think, as local reporters.”

Moore said the decision not to picture Davison was expected to last at least several more days. The 22-year-old was named, however, to make sure the incident could be fully and accurately reported.

On Thursday night as police responded to the shooting, there was a “vacuum of information” of about three-and-a-half hours as journalists waited for information about what had happened from emergency services.

In the meantime social media was awash with footage from the scene and unverified information. Plymouth Live decided not to use any of it and instead wait for the facts. Moore described that night as “incredibly hard”.

“It was evident from the outset that this was a major, major incident, and one that we just had to stick simply to the known facts on,” he said.

“So again, it felt like an easy decision at the time, it wasn’t even a decision it was just the way it was naturally handled. It was immensely difficult because of course we were seeing all those pictures and videos from the scene, we were seeing all the same social media posts that other members of the public were seeing with eyewitness reports and speculation, but we just felt that at a time when panic and fear was obviously very high amongst everyone in the city we had a duty to just report what was known.

“It would have been helpful if the emergency services were able to provide more timely details but obviously we’re dealing with a critical incident and we can totally understand that their resources were rightly focused on dealing with the matter in hand.”

The coverage has garnered some “extraordinary” audience figures for Plymouth Live, but Moore said this was “encouraging not because it’s a high number, but because people are trusting us to tell them the information about what’s going on”.

Asked what lessons he has learned so far from coverage of the incident, Moore said: “Our readers appreciate the fact that we’ve been as sensitive as we possibly can be in our reporting of this. It’s just reinforced to me how important it is to listen to your readers and… consider what you would want to read if you were affected yourself.”

Plymouth Live has also started a fundraiser with a local charity to support the families, friends and communities affected by the shooting. More than £20,000 was raised in the first two days.

Picture: PA Wire/Ben Birchall



Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.


9 thoughts on “'This is more than a news story for us': Why local journalists in Plymouth won't doorknock or show gunman's face”

  1. You’re partially right ASadStory – but it’s not pearl-clutching or virtue-signalling. I’m the crime reporter for the patch and over 25 years as a reporter I’ve done doornocks on the families of murder victims, terrorism victims, child sexual abuse victims. We’ve learned – the hard way – how images of the offenders are immensely “triggering”, and before you claim that’s virtue-signalling nonsense, let me remind you this is a military city where we have many ex-forces who suffer the effects of PTSD, and no-one with any brains or empathy would look one in the eye and call their PTSD triggers ‘virtue-signalling nonsense’. I’ve had calls from the families of child abusers like Vanessa George and William Goad about the use of images, calls from psychiatrists, support groups and specialists who have all explained how distressing it is to unexpectedly and repeatedly see very large images of their abusers at the top of a story rather than embedded halfway down. We listen to them and while we still use those images – we don’t use them as prominent as we used to.
    Many national reporters, and many freelancers and stringers, are insulated from those calls, letters and even face to face meetings months and years later. Local reporters are not, because we remain in the town we are reporting on.
    The current investigation will be broad and long and we’ve asked a series of questions and will continue to do so long after all the national press stringers have moved on to the ‘next big story’ and forgotten the names of those killed.
    We know who the guy was. Right now, no-one, and that includes the much vaunted national press who have scraped every social media site they can for “quotes” can say with any certainty “who could and should have stopped him”. What we’ve chosen to do is rein in the speculation and armchair experts and demand straight answer to the questions we’ve put and which are currently being examined by the IOPC.
    One last thing – about a dozen freelancers/stringers/nationals stood at the cordon when it came down and my colleague who was there said it looked like a swarm haring towards residents’ homes off like at the beginning of a horse race, all banging on door after door after door, again and again. They may have got something – well done them. This time around, we’re waiting and like often before, will be prepared to clean up after the mess they leave. We may even get better lines as a consequence.

1 2 3 4 5

Comments are closed.