Cadwalladr launches crowdfunder to support her work during libel fight

Carole Cadwalladr seeks funding to support her reporting during Arron Banks libel fight

Carole Cadwalladr is crowdfunding to support her investigation into alleged links between Brexit, Trump and Russia as she fights a libel case brought by prominent Leave campaigner Arron Banks.

The freelance journalist (pictured, right) fears she could lose her home and be made bankrupt by the defamation claim, which could see her facing a legal bill of at least £1m.

Cadwalladr exposed Cambridge Analytica in the Observer last year for having harvested millions of Facebook users’ data in an attempt to use it to influence the Trump elections and Brexit vote.

She is now investigating what she has claimed are possible links between the funding of the Leave campaign in the 2016 EU Referendum, Donald Trump’s election campaign and Russia.

Leave.EU communications director Andy Wigmore has said Cadwalladr’s claims about its funding are “far-fetched and just not true”.

Leave.EU co-founder Arron Banks (pictured, left) objects to claims made by Cadwalladr in two recent speeches that he was offered money by the Russian Government and had lied about his relationship with the regime.

Banks has always denied receiving money from Russia.

He filed defamation proceedings against Cadwalladr in the High Court last month claiming an “unlimited” amount in damages and £10,528 in court fees plus legal costs to be confirmed.

Cadwalladr’s team expect legal costs in the case, which they say is “entirely without merit”, to reach seven figures and therefore push her towards bankruptcy.

She told Press Gazette last month that despite offers of crowdfunding support for the legal case she would rather people put their money towards “more research and investigation into what he [Banks] and others are doing and did during the referendum”.

Her Go Fund Me page, set up last week, asks for support for her work while she is “tied up in litigation for months”.

Writing on the crowdfunding page, Cadwalladr said: “These tactics cannot win. We desperately need more reporting on this vital subject not less.

“What I need now is more resources to build a team to pursue the investigation with me, to amplify the story and to continue the fight back for democracy. Every penny will be spent supporting journalism that is more necessary than ever.

“Please join me if you can help me to continue to pursue the truth.”

Cadwalladr’s lawyer Ravi Naik, of ITN Solicitors, said: “Litigation is expensive, time-consuming and draining.

“British defamation laws are prohibitively expensive, to the point that the law can be used to silence a journalist in her efforts to report on the Leave campaign.

“Carole has done more than anyone to reveal electoral irregularities during the Brexit referendum. There is widespread public interest in Carole getting these investigations to a wider audience and we have every confidence that a court will agree.”

Wigmore told Press Gazette last week: “This is not about shutting a journalist or an organisation down, it’s about ensuring they report accurately and fairly and in Carole’s case she continues to make assertions which are factually far-fetched and just not true.”

Picture: Reuters/Hannah McKay and Press Gazette



Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.


6 thoughts on “Carole Cadwalladr seeks funding to support her reporting during Arron Banks libel fight”

  1. Pursuing the state level meddling aspect and not ministerial, corporate, financier is odd. It’s difficult to believe M. Cadwalladr is supporting the Russia did it conspiracy theory, although no doubt Russian ‘business’ as other nationals ‘business’ are involved. Mr Banks and others are literally making a fortune whilst allowed to get away with it under cover of this propaganda. M. Cadwalladr is giving Mr Banks exactly what he wants. M. Cadwalladr, although I believe in error, should be supported otherwise the real crimes will be swept under the carpet.

  2. I find myself torn on this issue. Carole is an exceptional journalist, as her shelf full of national and international awards attests. Her exposés about the corruption of our electoral process are extremely important and have not been taken anywhere near seriously enough, either by the rest of the media or by the authorities.

    However, I feel part of the reason her important work is not taken seriously is because of the huge difference between her published work, vetted and edited by major news organisations before it’s released, and her social media activity, which tends to involve her posing lots of highly suggestive questions she doesn’t yet know the answers to and needlessly goading particular individuals she says she is investigating.

    I have read that her tendency to throw caution to the wind and adopt a ‘publish and be damned’ mentality has caused serious problems in collaborative situations. Aside from being legally risky to make assertions or insinuations without the evidence to back them up, it’s also counter-productive to constantly tip off your subjects not only that you’re investigating them, but also about the specific areas of their lives that you’re investigating.

    Similarly concerning is that Carole keeps some extremely dubious company. She’s very tight with the Walter Mitty-ish conspiracy theorist and serial Impress-botherer Peter Jukes, who is one of her greatest champions. Unfortunately, he’s also a champion of Mark Watts, the former Exaro chief who’s been serially exposed for publishing false abuse allegations against a raft of high profile politicians.

    Prior to the recent Carl Beech fiasco, Watts’s last derp moment was when he published a photo of Ted Heath on a boat with a supposedly unidentified child and suggested it was evidence of off-shore abuse, only for it to turn out to be a family snap of Heath sailing with his godson. That story (which incurred an Impress sanction) was published on Byline – the platform headed up by… Peter Jukes – aka, Carole Cadwalladr’s biggest cheerleader, who has even co-hosted events with her.

    If I was Carole’s editor, I’d instruct her to leave get off Twitter, leave Peter Jukes and Byline alone, and quietly get on with her investigation, not allowing any information, questions or lines of enquiry to leak out prior to publication. Let the work speak for itself.

1 2 3

Comments are closed.